Byron100 wrote:I vote yes.
The main reason is that I believe that the natural resources of a country - any country, belongs to the people, and therefore, the benefits of those resources should flow to all the people, not to a lucky few that happen to be in a position to obtain them.
Personally, I've lost total faith in the so-called capitalistic economic system we operate under today, as this is what has led to the problem of Peak Oil in the first place. The whole "profit motive" makes us humans no different than bacteria in a petri dish...it's all about more, more, more, our population and resource use increasing at an exponential pace until....bam! No more left for anybody. Future generations will look back at our age and shake their heads in disbelief at our level of delusion. Infinite growth on a finite planet...how can we be so stupid??
Sure, nationalization probably will lead to a more rapid decline in the amount of oil produced...but I'm sure the folks 500 years from now would certainly be a bit more thankful to us for leaving some for them, however little it may be...LOL.
Cashmere wrote:A big "Amen" to big Tex - dead on assessment of government.
Government is a cancer with very few useful benefits - keep it as small as possible, excise the excess, and you'll be better off for it.
where YOU stand on this question of nationalization
Byron100 wrote:I vote yes.
The main reason is that I believe that the natural resources of a country - any country, belongs to the people, and therefore, the benefits of those resources should flow to all the people, not to a lucky few that happen to be in a position to obtain them.
Twilight wrote: People walk when outsiders start calling the shots.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests