Fact of the matter is, though that minimum wage in the US, no matter how you cut it, is an exhorbitant salary in most of the world and that is why there are no poor people in the US.
vision-master wrote:Fact of the matter is, though that minimum wage in the US, no matter how you cut it, is an exhorbitant salary in most of the world and that is why there are no poor people in the US.
No poor people in the US? That's a good one.
MarkJ wrote:I don't know anyone including teenagers that work for minimum wage, but many employers deal with wage inflation by raising prices, shopping for cheaper suppliers, outsourcing, offshoring, subcontracting, hiring more productive employees, eliminating less productive employees, eliminating unnecessary employees, eliminating overpaid employees, cutting benefits, cutting hours, reducing product quality/quantity/size, increasing sales volume and replacing workers and/or increasing efficiency through better communications, management, computerization and wageless robotic automation.
Kingcoal wrote:Getting around the minimum wage is easy, just don't hire any employees. I think that the demand for employees will drop until we have Depression era unemployment. If an employer needs help, he can just hire temps. Temps aren't technically employees so minimum wage laws don't apply. Regardless, temps tend to make much more than the minimum wage anyway. The reason is that they are not a liability for an employer. The traditional employer/employee relationship is like a marriage, meaning that you just can't kick people to the curb without repercussions. Firing people requires cause, which isn't easy to prove in court. Laying people off is expensive, because you have to pay them unemployment. On top of that, employees have all kinds of other costs and liabilities; for example, they can sue an employer for discrimination. Temps are easy, they just show up on the books as an expense, nothing more. When the employer is done with them; adios. For that reason, I've noticed that more and more traditional employers are turning to using temps long term. That can have some gotchas when it comes to the IRS, but from what I see, it's becoming a new trend.
Kingcoal wrote:The traditional employer/employee relationship is like a marriage, meaning that you just can't kick people to the curb without repercussions. Firing people requires cause, which isn't easy to prove in court. .
Q: Can an employee be fired without due cause?
A: Yes. New York State is an "employment-at-will," state. Without a contract restricting termination (such as a collective bargaining agreement) an employer has the right to discharge an employee at any time for any reason. This also protects the employee's right to resign. An employer may fire an employee for "no reason" - or even for a reason that might seem arbitrary and unfair -- and the employee is equally free to quit at any time without being required to explain or defend that decision.
There are a few exceptions to "employment-at-will." The most significant of these are laws, enforced by the New York State Division of Human Rights, which prohibit discrimination based upon race, creed, national origin, age, handicap, gender, sexual orientation or marital status.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests