seahorse2 wrote:In concept its possible for the US to remain on top, however, it would require a lot of changes for this reason: this assumes the Chinese and Arabs will continue to finance our military spending by buying our bonds. It assumes the ME will not unpeg their currencies from the dollar thus, tanking the dollar. For the US to maintain its current status, it needs to be able to continue to run massive trade and budget deficits, which I don't think it possible, at least not in a capitalist system. If the US had a different system, something other than its capitalist system where it could ignore and repudiate all it owes to foreigners and its own citizens (entitlement programs), then yes, it maybe able to continue for a long time. But, we are not Spartans, even though most Americans think they are.
Milret2 wrote:Let's see. America has done so very well taking over Iraq and stabilizing the Iraqi oil production and transport issues there. So far we have only spent 4000+ American lives, who knows how many Iraqi lives, bankrupted our country with over (so far) over half a trillion dollars in war costs growing currently at over $300 million per day, we have broken our carefully put together volunteer armed service (at least the boots on the ground part and a LOT of the equipment they prosecute war with), sold our country to the Chinese to finance the war, and enjoyed the heck out of being civilians in this country while ignoring returning vets who are dead, maimed, shell shocked, and terribly tired. Yep .. we are ready to take over the world and run it really well. Thank god we still have an intercontinental ballistic missile system ready to take out any country that disagrees with us.
Once America takes PHYSICAL control of the oil, the rest of the world will be more than happy to continue financing the US at whatever the cost and the dollar will be gold..
BigTex wrote:Pure fantasy.
The U.S. doesn't win wars of attrition, and ANY ME occupation will turn into exactly that (see Iraq).
Modern militaries are quite easy to harrass when parked in stationary positions in hostile territory.
This harrassment is both demoralizing and VERY expensive to counter.
Please tell me this is some sort of exercise in counterintuitive strategic thinking, and not a serious idea.
titanic wrote:BigTex wrote:Pure fantasy.
The U.S. doesn't win wars of attrition, and ANY ME occupation will turn into exactly that (see Iraq).
Modern militaries are quite easy to harrass when parked in stationary positions in hostile territory.
This harrassment is both demoralizing and VERY expensive to counter.
Please tell me this is some sort of exercise in counterintuitive strategic thinking, and not a serious idea.
90% of the "reconstruction" going on in Iraq is of large ass solid concrete bomb proof PERMANENT military bases, forts, installations, etc... These will be capable of housing tens of thousands of troops for decades upon decades...
So everyone's "a camel with a pack of C4 can bring it down" thinking is IMHO too over simplified...
And lets not kid ourselves, despite everything, the US still has the single most powerful and sophisticated military might in the world, one that will not be challenged anytime soon, if ever, (since we are slide down the gorge)
Chuckmak wrote:
Twilight wrote:Nice map.
How much will oil cost?
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests