BigTex wrote:I wonder why there is not more discussion of peak natural gas. Simmons talks about it, but there's not a lot of discussion out there about it.
BigTex wrote:Anyone feel better about natural gas than they do oil.
KillTheHumans wrote:6,000 TCF in known deposits and a 100 TCF/year consumption rate means it might be a problem sometime, but it sure isn't one of scarcity during the next couple of decades.
Absolutely. CBM and unconventional production completely reversed the US production decline and brought it to a new peak level, and the rest of world ignores that end of the resource spectrum. To say "there is alot more to be found" is an understatement.
BigTex wrote:If there is plenty, why is the price rising more or less in tandem with oil?That seems odd.
Starvid wrote:No one needs natural gas for anything. It's completely optional.
Starvid wrote:No one needs natural gas for anything. It's completely optional. Oil on the other hand. This is why peak oil is much, much worse than peak gas.
cube wrote:I think in the future NG (natural gas) will be too expensive to be used for producing electricity. Nuclear power and coal will fill that role.
The advantage of natural gas is it's very useful for providing heat to homes.
20 years ago NG was probably averaging only $2 per MMBTU.
So it made sense to build NG power plants.
It's now a whopping $12 per MMBTU.
$12 NG is to electricity
as
$100 oil is to transportation
It's expensive enough to create demand destruction.
NG has a history of extreme price volatility that's because it is not "fungible" unlike oil. Most oil gets transported by ships. So if 1 oil supplier goes down, you can easily buy from another. That's why you'll never see $100 oil in one part of the world and $300 oil in another. Unless there was a war or a natural disaster that severed transportation that makes no sense.BigTex wrote:...
What is your prediction regarding how natural gas prices will track oil prices from here forward? I think that natural gas prices potentially have more room to increase than oil prices, in part because the natural gas applications are less subject to demand destruction than oil applications.
...
The actual NG power plants are cheap. It's the NG that's expensive. I don't think an NG plant can be converted to coal. Here's the funny thing. The cost of NG fuel is so expensive it might actually be cheaper to put a perfectly good working NG power plant into early retirement and replace it with a coal fired power plant.BigTex wrote:...
What is involved in switching a natural gas power plant to coal? I suspsect it's not a simple operation, once the regulatory matters are factored in. In a lot of cities like Houston and Dallas, air quality is only fair right now. I wonder what it would be like if all of the power plants in the area were burning coal rather than natural gas.
cube wrote:Just wait till electricity prices go up and society will be happy to politically approve any project that will *hopefully* help bring prices down. I think 20cents / kWh would be the breaking point.
50cents / kWh is within the realm of possibility much like $300 oil is possible IMHO.
BigTex wrote:
I think the term "economically uninhabitable" will be applied to larger homes when electricity reaches that price.
Excessive square footage will be regarded as a kind of "financial black mold."
BigTex wrote:
Beyond that, though, I think some people will struggle who are already spread a little thin even after the extra insulation is applied.
I do think that sales of high end efficient HVAC systems will benefit from all of this, though. That becomes cost effective at some point, just like a hybrid car does when gas prices reach a certain point.
BigTex wrote:...
I think the term "economically uninhabitable" will be applied to larger homes when electricity reaches that price.
Excessive square footage will be regarded as a kind of "financial black mold."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests