joeltrout wrote:Yes but some is better than none even if it takes several years. Right now and in the coming decade we have no alternative. That scares me.
joeltrout
syrac818 wrote:Over the past couple of years, I haven't really enjoyed most of Monte's post. Just relentlessly doomer, with the annoying doomer catch phrases and one liners attached.
But this is an excellent, excellent post. Totally breaks down the facts of a fairly convoluted issue that's at the top of the top of the headlines. Really appreciate your work on this - thanks.
MonteQuest wrote:joeltrout wrote:Yes but some is better than none even if it takes several years. Right now and in the coming decade we have no alternative. That scares me.
joeltrout
Sure we do. Powerdown all aspects of our lives.
Developing more energy is what scares me.
MonteQuest wrote:joeltrout wrote:Yes but some is better than none even if it takes several years. Right now and in the coming decade we have no alternative. That scares me.
joeltrout
Sure we do. Powerdown all aspects of our lives.
Developing more energy is what scares me.
Drifter wrote:This is exactly why the US and other countries will self-destruct. Refusal to voluntarily power down. Instead, full throttle off the cliff.
The political fact is that as long as you have politicians, TV personalities and what not beating the drum, you will have a significant number, perhaps the majority of people who will believe that the cause of their problems are the restrictions on drilling.
Dezakin wrote:MonteQuest wrote:joeltrout wrote:Yes but some is better than none even if it takes several years. Right now and in the coming decade we have no alternative. That scares me.
joeltrout
Sure we do. Powerdown all aspects of our lives.
Developing more energy is what scares me.
You must be terrified of a future where we aren't actually in overshoot then, where global energy production is several times larger than it is today.
Every barrel of oil will be displacing coal in that timeframe, seeing CTL is what the alternative is going to be.
The opening of the ANWR 1002 Area to oil and natural gas development is projected to increase domestic crude oil production starting in 2018. In the mean ANWR oil resource case, additional oil production resulting from the opening of ANWR reaches 780,000 barrels per day in 2027 and then declines to 710,000 barrels per day in 2030. In the low and high ANWR oil resource cases, additional oil production resulting from the opening of ANWR peaks in 2028 at 510,000 and 1.45 million barrels per day, respectively. Between 2018 and 2030, cumulative additional oil production is 2.6 billion barrels for the mean oil resource case, while the low and high resource cases project a cumulative additional oil production of 1.9 and 4.3 billion barrels, respectively.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests