Heineken wrote:I've noticed a change in the tenor and content of a few of the major-media reports. Some have emphasized declining production and increasing demand, which certainly goes to the crux of it. A few even make mention of hair-raising prospects like $7 and $10 gasoline (hair-raising for us Americans, anyway)
The rest of the reports are still completely brain-dead.
sjn wrote:I've noticed recently people are far more receptive to the idea of Peak Oil. In actual fact, I'd go as far to say that I've not failed to wake up anybody lately. It seems the current crop of mainstream news articles, while not givng much away (certainly not here in the UK), combined with first hand experiences are acting as a decent primer.
That's not to say that some people don't have their own "theories" about what's happening, evil oil companies, or the Arabs etc, but those people aren't really asleep to start with, just deluded!
Heineken wrote:Well, that's true, Socrates, but first we must pass through partial dieoff and the Greater Depression. Kinda sobers you up. This will not be a smooth-sailing transition.
Heineken wrote:Well, that's true, Socrates, but first we must pass through partial dieoff and the Greater Depression. Kinda sobers you up. This will not be a smooth-sailing transition.
socrates1fan wrote:The only dieoff I see in the world due to PO is in 3rd and 2nd world countries.
socrates1fan wrote: The only dieoff I see in the world due to PO is in 3rd and 2nd world countries.
Not only is the US the most powerful nation in the world, but we feed a lot of the planet. Here at least there is food everywhere, even after the flood. If dieoffs happen it would probably be from heatwaves and too expensive of electricity to cool your home. Medical-related deaths would probably shoot up but your not going to have deaths here in NA in the millions(except maybe Mexico.).
eastbay wrote:socrates1fan wrote:The only dieoff I see in the world due to PO is in 3rd and 2nd world countries.
There are many living in the USA who survive in serious poverty which can only be described as 'third world' conditions. They too will be among the first to go when Our Common Disaster finally hits. The poor everywhere will be the first and worst impacted. It will be fascinating to watch this process unfold, uh... for those fortunate enough to survive the initial crunch.
Note: The term 'second world', no longer applies to any nation. It's anachronistic holding historical interest only. It was primarily (and rarely) used to describe communist Eastern Europe/ USSR. It was used to describe that handful of developed command economies of which there are currently none.
MonteQuest wrote:socrates1fan wrote: The only dieoff I see in the world due to PO is in 3rd and 2nd world countries.
Not only is the US the most powerful nation in the world, but we feed a lot of the planet. Here at least there is food everywhere, even after the flood.If dieoffs happen it would probably be from heatwaves and too expensive of electricity to cool your home. Medical-related deaths would probably shoot up but your not going to have deaths here in NA in the millions(except maybe Mexico.).
Then I suggest you do a little homework on the mechanism of a die-off.
It is through disease that populations in overshoot die-off.
Sure, some starve, but it is the declining availability of resources that leads to malnurition that opens up the population to disease.
And pandemic diseases know no boundaries and take no prisoners.
Being possibly somewhat well-fed in NA isn't going to protect millions from a pandemic.
Read a little on the Spanish FLu of 1918 or the concern over Bird Flu, SARS, Ebola viruses, etc.
We may be the most powerful nation, but we are also the most dependent nation on oil.
Look to history. The USA took the worse hit in the great Depression because we were so industrilized.
The US will not get a pass on the population correction
socrates1fan wrote:You will probably have less people being able to afford treatment for things such as diabities or other usually treatable diseases which would probably take a chunk out of the nation's population.
But your not going to have millions of people dead.
Ludi wrote:socrates1fan wrote:You will probably have less people being able to afford treatment for things such as diabities or other usually treatable diseases which would probably take a chunk out of the nation's population.
But your not going to have millions of people dead.
About 23 million US citizens have diabetes, or about 8% of the population.
Millions of people. [url=http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics.jsp]diabetes[url]
eastbay wrote:socrates1fan wrote:The only dieoff I see in the world due to PO is in 3rd and 2nd world countries.
There are many living in the USA who survive in serious poverty which can only be described as 'third world' conditions. They too will be among the first to go when Our Common Disaster finally hits. The poor everywhere will be the first and worst impacted. It will be fascinating to watch this process unfold, uh... for those fortunate enough to survive the initial crunch.
Note: The term 'second world', no longer applies to any nation. It's anachronistic holding historical interest only. It was primarily (and rarely) used to describe communist Eastern Europe/ USSR. It was used to describe that handful of developed command economies of which there are currently none.
socrates1fan wrote:Okay, millions of people could die from lack of diabetes treatment.
Ludi wrote:socrates1fan wrote:Okay, millions of people could die from lack of diabetes treatment.
The US has quite poor health by First World standards.
socrates1fan wrote:Heineken wrote:Well, that's true, Socrates, but first we must pass through partial dieoff and the Greater Depression. Kinda sobers you up. This will not be a smooth-sailing transition.
The only dieoff I see in the world due to PO is in 3rd and 2nd world countries.
Not only is the US the most powerful nation in the world, but we feed a lot of the planet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests