Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

People seem to want oil , not conserve

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby doodlebug2 » Tue 01 Jul 2008, 21:45:00

In an article in MSNBC today, a Pew Survey showed that more people want more drilling, exploration, power plants, refineries and such and not conservation. This shows what the citizens want, they do not believe in Peak Oil and or care about the enviroment.
It may not be good for the enviroment in the future. Oil shale, and tar sands, here we come.
User avatar
doodlebug2
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby Cashmere » Tue 01 Jul 2008, 22:09:17

In short,


yes,


it is hopeless.


We are going to burn every molecule of carbon we can get our hands on until there is nothing but ashes and dead people.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby socrates1fan » Tue 01 Jul 2008, 22:36:02

Did people seriously think people were riding busses to save the planet or to conserve energy?
Uh no.
People rode them because it was economical.
I am against drilling here because we need high gas prices to push the demand for alternatives and public transportation.
People don't seem to realize that the environment does play a role.
If it is ruined you better kiss your butt goodbye.
User avatar
socrates1fan
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed 04 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby socrates1fan » Tue 01 Jul 2008, 22:36:57

Cashmere wrote:In short,


yes,


it is hopeless.


We are going to burn every molecule of carbon we can get our hands on until there is nothing but ashes and dead people.


Noooo
we will burn the dead people
then there will be nothing but ash. =]
User avatar
socrates1fan
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed 04 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby KrellEnergySource » Tue 01 Jul 2008, 23:30:14

What peeople want is food. 3-4 times per day.
To get that food they need a job.
To have a job, they need an economy.
To have an economy, they need busness as usual.
To have business as usual, they realize the need for oil.

Unless we have a way to meet basic needs for people without an economy based on market activity, what choice do people really have but say drill and pump when that is threatened?

Is it greedy to want to eat?
User avatar
KrellEnergySource
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon 31 Oct 2005, 04:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby syrac818 » Tue 01 Jul 2008, 23:55:49

People are conserving - prices take care of that.

An 811,000 barrel per day drop in American oil consumption is plenty proof. And that's just in April, just wait until we see the June numbers.

Now really peakoil.com - I appreciate all the opinions and information on here. But personally, it's really f*cking lame this huge drop in demand got such little play on here. That drop is more than twice the annual demand growth of China. More than Chinese, Indian and Saudi demand growth combined.

That's not to say peak oil isn't here and it isn't real. But it is to say that there is more to the issue than "we're all soooo screwed".
User avatar
syrac818
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed 01 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 00:05:51

socrates1fan wrote:Noooo
we will burn the dead people
then there will be nothing but ash. =]


Soylent Biosiesel?
mos6507
 

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby neocone » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 00:13:21

Yes I also want to have a supermodel as girlfriend... chances of it happening? Almost nil. Because such limited is supply vs. the demand for the product.
User avatar
neocone
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sat 23 Sep 2006, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby socrates1fan » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 00:16:36

mos6507 wrote:
socrates1fan wrote:Noooo
we will burn the dead people
then there will be nothing but ash. =]


Soylent Biosiesel?


=0
the most amazing invention ever.
Start digging up the dead folks!
We finally have a use for them! =D
User avatar
socrates1fan
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed 04 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 01:34:06

syrac818 wrote:People are conserving - prices take care of that.

An 811,000 barrel per day drop in American oil consumption is plenty proof.


A drop in demand is not proof of conservation any more than if I said that a drop in demand was the result of the inability to pay, job loss, bankruptcy, or a massive drop in sales.

But I would bet it is the latter. Recession.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 01:43:27

MonteQuest wrote:
syrac818 wrote:People are conserving - prices take care of that.

An 811,000 barrel per day drop in American oil consumption is plenty proof.


A drop in demand is not proof of conservation any more than if I said that a drop in demand was the result of the inability to pay, job loss, bankruptcy, or a massive drop in sales.

But I would bet it is the latter. Recession.


Does it matter how demand destruction occurs? Or it's only holy and good if it comes from people's pure hearts?
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1548
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby syrac818 » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 02:00:54

MonteQuest wrote:
syrac818 wrote:People are conserving - prices take care of that.

An 811,000 barrel per day drop in American oil consumption is plenty proof.


A drop in demand is not proof of conservation any more than if I said that a drop in demand was the result of the inability to pay, job loss, bankruptcy, or a massive drop in sales.

But I would bet it is the latter. Recession.



What?? LOL...

Where the hell did you expect the drop in demand to come from? A national feel good campaign? A collection of specials run on the ABC family network about how "Carpooling is Cool"?

Just because it's conservation caused by high prices doesn't mean it's not conservation. You can try to label it whatever you want to give it a more doomer feel... but it is what it is.
User avatar
syrac818
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed 01 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 02:04:22

syrac818 wrote:
MonteQuest wrote:
syrac818 wrote:People are conserving - prices take care of that.

An 811,000 barrel per day drop in American oil consumption is plenty proof.


A drop in demand is not proof of conservation any more than if I said that a drop in demand was the result of the inability to pay, job loss, bankruptcy, or a massive drop in sales.

But I would bet it is the latter. Recession.



What?? LOL...

Where the hell did you expect the drop in demand to come from? A national feel good campaign? A collection of specials run on the ABC family network about how "Carpooling is Cool"?

Just because it's conservation caused by high prices doesn't mean it's not conservation. You can try to label it whatever you want to give it a more doomer feel... but it is what it is.


Doomers are doomers. Everything will be spun to "doom is coming". Same thing with the AGW stuff. If it's cold it's AGW, if it's hot during summer it's AGW. You just can't reason with these nuts.
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1548
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby AgentR » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 02:09:36

Many PO discussion include significant discussions about demand destruction. Perhaps some are a bit idealistic and would have preferred an egalitarian allocation of our precious liquid energy supplies. Others such as myself have long argued that there is only one mechanism which causes reduced demand, and that is elevated prices. It is why PO isn't a bell curve, its a plateau with a gradually declining backside that will run until there is no longer enough fuel available to keep advanced economies alive.

Then the price mechanism will fail.
Bullet mechanism with rise to take its place.
Rapidly followed by annihilation of commercial production.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby SILENTTODD » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 02:44:22

Conservation be damned! Full Speed Ahead!

Image
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby americandream » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 06:39:25

AgentR wrote:Many PO discussion include significant discussions about demand destruction. Perhaps some are a bit idealistic and would have preferred an egalitarian allocation of our precious liquid energy supplies. Others such as myself have long argued that there is only one mechanism which causes reduced demand, and that is elevated prices. It is why PO isn't a bell curve, its a plateau with a gradually declining backside that will run until there is no longer enough fuel available to keep advanced economies alive.

Then the price mechanism will fail.
Bullet mechanism with rise to take its place.
Rapidly followed by annihilation of commercial production.


Predicted by Karl Marx I might add.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby skyemoor » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 07:20:30

Serial_Worrier wrote:Doomers are doomers. Everything will be spun to "doom is coming". Same thing with the AGW stuff. If it's cold it's AGW, if it's hot during summer it's AGW. You just can't reason with these nuts.


You'll find that contentless posts like this will lower your veracity around here. And calling people 'nuts' is a form of ad hominem that runs counter to the CoC, so correct your posting style.
http://www.carfree.com
http://ecoplan.org/carshare/cs_index.htm
http://www.velomobile.de/GB/Advantages/advantages.html

Chance favors the prepared mind. -- Louis Pasteur

He that lives upon hope will die fasting. --Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
skyemoor
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1511
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Appalachian Foothills of Virginia

Re: People seem to want oil , not conserve

Unread postby heartandseoul » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 09:57:28

"People seem to want oil, not conserve" is right. Now, it seems they'll do anything to get it:

<a href="http://www.wlwt.com/news/16768006/detail.html">Woman Trades Sex for $100 in Gas</a>

I also saw on news this morning where a woman filled her tank and began pulling out without paying. The clerk jumped in front of the car to stop her and she kept on driving with the clerk on the hood of her car.
User avatar
heartandseoul
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu 29 May 2008, 03:00:00

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests