Cashmere wrote:In short,
yes,
it is hopeless.
We are going to burn every molecule of carbon we can get our hands on until there is nothing but ashes and dead people.
socrates1fan wrote:Noooo
we will burn the dead people
then there will be nothing but ash. =]
mos6507 wrote:socrates1fan wrote:Noooo
we will burn the dead people
then there will be nothing but ash. =]
Soylent Biosiesel?
syrac818 wrote:People are conserving - prices take care of that.
An 811,000 barrel per day drop in American oil consumption is plenty proof.
MonteQuest wrote:syrac818 wrote:People are conserving - prices take care of that.
An 811,000 barrel per day drop in American oil consumption is plenty proof.
A drop in demand is not proof of conservation any more than if I said that a drop in demand was the result of the inability to pay, job loss, bankruptcy, or a massive drop in sales.
But I would bet it is the latter. Recession.
MonteQuest wrote:syrac818 wrote:People are conserving - prices take care of that.
An 811,000 barrel per day drop in American oil consumption is plenty proof.
A drop in demand is not proof of conservation any more than if I said that a drop in demand was the result of the inability to pay, job loss, bankruptcy, or a massive drop in sales.
But I would bet it is the latter. Recession.
syrac818 wrote:MonteQuest wrote:syrac818 wrote:People are conserving - prices take care of that.
An 811,000 barrel per day drop in American oil consumption is plenty proof.
A drop in demand is not proof of conservation any more than if I said that a drop in demand was the result of the inability to pay, job loss, bankruptcy, or a massive drop in sales.
But I would bet it is the latter. Recession.
What?? LOL...
Where the hell did you expect the drop in demand to come from? A national feel good campaign? A collection of specials run on the ABC family network about how "Carpooling is Cool"?
Just because it's conservation caused by high prices doesn't mean it's not conservation. You can try to label it whatever you want to give it a more doomer feel... but it is what it is.
AgentR wrote:Many PO discussion include significant discussions about demand destruction. Perhaps some are a bit idealistic and would have preferred an egalitarian allocation of our precious liquid energy supplies. Others such as myself have long argued that there is only one mechanism which causes reduced demand, and that is elevated prices. It is why PO isn't a bell curve, its a plateau with a gradually declining backside that will run until there is no longer enough fuel available to keep advanced economies alive.
Then the price mechanism will fail.
Bullet mechanism with rise to take its place.
Rapidly followed by annihilation of commercial production.
Serial_Worrier wrote:Doomers are doomers. Everything will be spun to "doom is coming". Same thing with the AGW stuff. If it's cold it's AGW, if it's hot during summer it's AGW. You just can't reason with these nuts.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests