by Precipice » Tue 15 Jul 2008, 03:28:26
What would be the embodied emissions and/or energy of building one of these farm-scrapers vs the embodied emissions/energy of clearing land and building farm on a patch of land which could grow an equivalent amount of food??
Then you have to consider Malthus and Jevons- are these 'sky-farms' meant to replace existing land farms or will they just be constructed to enhance existing food production capacity??
The comment in the article about how an investment banker is willing to pay more for real estate than a tomato (or something along those lines) may be true for now. But what happens when the finance industry collapses and food really starts to get scarce- but then again if we get to that point, I doubt we will be able or willing to build more skyscrapers of any kind anyway.....
PS Perhaps the new energy fantasy thread can be called "Cornucopian Conceptions"?