jbrovont wrote:The directive does seem to indicate that, but invoking it would cause a constitutional crisis. Bush doesn't have the authority to scuttle the powers of the Constitution since his authority comes from the Constitution. If he did this I think legally he, and anyone who continued to obey him, would become a splinter cell and cease to be a legal part of the US gov't. Depending of course, on who was paying the lawyer reading the Constitution.
Reverse Engineer wrote:The House of Cards of all currencies is pinned to the dollar, if the dollar tanks, everybody tanks.
Gold-linked currency? There aren’t any more of those. So why not make one? Today, there are discussions about depegging regional currencies like the United Arab Emirates’ dirham from the unreliable dollar, and perhaps repegging to a currency basket. But is a currency basket, of many fiat currencies, much better than a single fiat currency? "Some [OPEC members] said producing countries should designate a single hard currency aside from the U.S. dollar ... to form the basis of our oil trade," Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said recently.
Ah, there’s the rub. There are no hard currencies. Only varying degrees of softness. No central bank today wants its currency to rise further against the dollar. During the 1970s, all the fiat currencies in the world got dragged down with the dollar, because of the trade implications of allowing the dollar to fall too far against their currencies. The pound, deutschemark and yen were no escape. Inflation roared throughout the world.
Ferretlover wrote:One of the (many) problems I have with this "catastrophe:" Way too many people in business and the government ran amuck in the economic arena, the entire time telling John Q. Public that everything was great, wonderful, terrific-fully funded, backed and guaranteed.
They lied.
NOW we're supposed to believe that they know exactly how many billions of dollars would fix everything and make everything perfect again?
I don't think so.
I would like to see a great many arrests that end up in extremely long prison terms.
Pops wrote:Boy I'm getting tired of these threads.
This (the current economic climate) could be a real downer but in the 70s things were much worse and in the 80's S&L thing things were much worse and Reagan's military buildup hangover is still with us.
The catastrophic emergency for the US is Peak Oil.
Doesn't anyone get that?
Pops wrote:The catastrophic emergency for the US is Peak Oil. Doesn't anyone get that?
TheDude wrote:I respect/applaud your cautionary streak, Pops. I'm not jumping to conclusions about the intent behind this statement, either; but come on...
Pops wrote:But we need to figure out what we are each about.
The thing that gets my goat is the They Are Gonna Get Us Crap espoused around here and the only alternative offered is They Are Gonna Get Us.
Nothing about Me doing something for us.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests