Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Is this the "worst case"?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby Spanktron9 » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 09:41:36

During the height of the oil rally when Matt Simmons was on CNBC several times, he was asked to give a worst case scenario for oil. After saying they didn't want to hear his worst case (DOOM!), he responded that he felt a precipitous drop in oil pricing would lead to a back-burnering of energy policy and research (paraphrase). It seems to me that we are witnessing this now. Has Simmons or other PO leaders offered any further analysis on this situation? Thoughts?
Who are you going to turn to when all the crazy Peak-oil doomers end up being right?
User avatar
Spanktron9
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue 03 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Terrified beyond the capacity for rational thought

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby ohanian » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 11:02:58

In all things in live, there are limits.

But there is no limit to human stupidity!

It's not that there are no wise men (or woman).

It's that those who art wise are not in power.

Those who are in power, are only as smart as George W Bush.
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby Daniel_Plainview » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 11:31:12

Spanktron9 wrote:During the height of the oil rally when Matt Simmons was on CNBC several times, he was asked to give a worst case scenario for oil. After saying they didn't want to hear his worst case (DOOM!), he responded that he felt a precipitous drop in oil pricing would lead to a back-burnering of energy policy and research (paraphrase). It seems to me that we are witnessing this now. Has Simmons or other PO leaders offered any further analysis on this situation? Thoughts?

Spanktron: Do you have a link for this CNBC interview? I vaguely recall it.
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 15:00:29

I can offer a scenario in which the recent price drop might actually put PO back into the national conversation in just a few months. Not going to offer a probability of this happening but I do think it is possible.

It could hinge on two variables. First, OPEC finally establishing itself as a true cartel.
That doesn't mean they'll push oil back up to $150/bbl by shutting in enough production. But if they could ramp prices back up closer to $90 -100 it would start hitting the public seriously in the pocket book again. But the practical, and I think equally important, psychological impact would be confusing for many. The public would see a future where even the demand destruction currently developing won’t ensure cheap oil in the future. The second shock would come if we do in fact have a colder then normal winter as forecast by the NWS. With much of the NG still shut in the GOM it’s easy to anticipate a NG price spike this winter. Though not directly related to oil pricing this might still bring energy to the forefront of conversations.

Of course, it still remains to be seen if the OPEC members can finally muster the necessary discipline. But we should know that answer by the New Year. I don’t think Matt was talking about a short term (6+ months or so) drop in price as far as a WCS. I would think he meant several years which would bring us much closer to PO before the negative impacts started hitting us at an obvious level.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby Spanktron9 » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 15:03:10

DoomWarrior wrote:Spanktron: Do you have a link for this CNBC interview? I vaguely recall it.

Doom-
Unfortunately not. I was hoping someone here was a better archivalist than myself. It was in the midst of an interview and not the main point, so I doubt I could find it again without watching all of the interviews.
Who are you going to turn to when all the crazy Peak-oil doomers end up being right?
User avatar
Spanktron9
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue 03 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Terrified beyond the capacity for rational thought

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby sjn » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 15:11:28

ROCKMAN, actually Matt, like myself and many others here have long been of the opinion that we've been on the PO plateau for a few years now. The moment of decline from that plateau was always going to appear to the world a financial event. I didn't expect oil prices to fall this low, but I did expect severe development/production financing problems to appear around this time.
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 15:19:33

8) Did you catch Sarah Palin's speach today in Ohio? She was calling the present price drop a window of opportunity to become energy independant. Made a pretty good case. It was a set piece of course, read off a tela-promter, but she used the term "tap into" way to many times for it to have been written by a professonal speach writer. Pretty scary that she is the voice of reason on the subject. They don't seem to have a clue as to the lead time to get any alternatives into production but perhaps they don't want to panic the sheeple this week.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:07:38

I agree with you, sjn, about the plateau as well as the above ground factors looming large. Now did I expect to see such a big price drop but I don't think it will last too. Just going to be a bumpy plateau for a good while perhaps.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby Pops » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 17:45:41

The Worst Case is the scenario where you breath a sigh of relief filling up at $1.99 today and do nothing to change your life.

PO is gonna getcha sooner or later so best get ready sooner.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 29 Oct 2008, 18:01:42

ROCKMAN wrote:It could hinge on two variables. First, OPEC finally establishing itself as a true cartel.

I don't see that happening. For one thing, they would face incredible political pressure and likely even military attack if they did something like that. The Carter doctrine was not a joke. For another, I think you have to think for a second about why oil prices are down in the first place. The reason is that world economies are collapsing. What's gonna happen if OPEC successfully drives up oil prices? First of all, it may not make them any more money because they're now selling lower volumes at higher prices. Secondly it's probably going to significantly exacerbate the collapse of world economies such that we may have even less money available to buy oil. It's essential to OPEC that world economies not collapse or else they'll have no one to sell oil to.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Thu 30 Oct 2008, 07:10:18

You're right girl. That's why I offer it as a possibility and not a prediction. But over the years I've heard things from expats that worked over there. How much is was true (and still is) I can't be sure. But there are strong forces within the KSA always vying for control. But it is clear that the ruling family has used the oil revenue to subdue internal discontent.

And they certainly must consider those political/military reactions you mentioned. But the KSA doesn't live in a vacuum. With the US a hop, skip and jump away in Iraq and Iran right across the gulf I can imagine they are constantly looking over both shoulders. But there are also some hard biz considerations: I'm not sure of the current status but there was a time 6 or 8 years ago that the KSA was so deeply in debt that there was quit chatter about a possible default. But I doubt we can get a clear picture of their current financial situation any better then their reserve numbers.

The main reason I offer that scenario as a possibility is because of the volatility of the situation on so many fronts at the moment. And such uncertain times can lead to unpredictably, even unimaginable, consequences.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Thu 30 Oct 2008, 14:34:56

ROCKMAN wrote:You're right girl. That's why I offer it as a possibility and not a prediction. But over the years I've heard things from expats that worked over there. How much is was true (and still is) I can't be sure. But there are strong forces within the KSA always vying for control. But it is clear that the ruling family has used the oil revenue to subdue internal discontent.

And they certainly must consider those political/military reactions you mentioned. But the KSA doesn't live in a vacuum. With the US a hop, skip and jump away in Iraq and Iran right across the gulf I can imagine they are constantly looking over both shoulders. But there are also some hard biz considerations: I'm not sure of the current status but there was a time 6 or 8 years ago that the KSA was so deeply in debt that there was quit chatter about a possible default. But I doubt we can get a clear picture of their current financial situation any better then their reserve numbers.

The main reason I offer that scenario as a possibility is because of the volatility of the situation on so many fronts at the moment. And such uncertain times can lead to unpredictably, even unimaginable, consequences.


Why doesn't the KSA simply embargo oil to America to shut down to aircraft carriers?
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1548
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Thu 30 Oct 2008, 14:40:27

For one thing the US Navy, nor any other portion of the US military, will never lack fuel thanks to the SPR. That's why the SPR was built in the first place. Secondly, if the KSA sold "our" oil to some else then they would be receiving oil from their original supplier. The only way to deny any oil imports to any country would be for all exporting nations to agree. Given the critical need for revenue by all the exporters that's not likely to happen. IMO.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Thu 30 Oct 2008, 14:54:58

We spend a lot of time contemplating conditions here in North America post peak oil but imagine for a minute if you will KSA after the last barrel is pumped. That last barrel will probably sell for $1000 but who will be running the pump and where will it get shipped? Will the country revert to a pile of sand crisscrossed with rusting plumbing? Wonder what their plan to keep the oil wealth is?
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby Spanktron9 » Thu 30 Oct 2008, 16:14:01

vtsnowedin wrote:We spend a lot of time contemplating conditions here in North America post peak oil but imagine for a minute if you will KSA after the last barrel is pumped. That last barrel will probably sell for $1000 but who will be running the pump and where will it get shipped? Will the country revert to a pile of sand crisscrossed with rusting plumbing? Wonder what their plan to keep the oil wealth is?


Glass factory? sandbag manufacturer? retirement compound?
Who are you going to turn to when all the crazy Peak-oil doomers end up being right?
User avatar
Spanktron9
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue 03 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Terrified beyond the capacity for rational thought

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby Cloud9 » Thu 30 Oct 2008, 16:30:08

The Wahabists will get their country back.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby Koyaanisqatsi » Fri 31 Oct 2008, 03:17:15

Spanktron9 wrote:It seems to me that we are witnessing this now. Has Simmons or other PO leaders offered any further analysis on this situation? Thoughts?


Richard Heinberg:

The Financial Times has leaked the results of the International Energy Agency's long-awaited study of the depletion profiles of the world's 400 largest oilfields, indicating that, "Without extra investment to raise production, the natural annual rate of output decline is 9.1 per cent." This is a stunning figure.... Investment capital is being vaporized almost daily in a global deflationary bonfire of unprecedented ferocity. Oil production projects are being mothballed left and right."


By the way, I think the "Worst Case" Simmons interview was on the CNN "We Were Warned" special, if memory serves.
User avatar
Koyaanisqatsi
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Pacific NW

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby pedalling_faster » Fri 31 Oct 2008, 07:40:43

the oil companies might cut back R&D for alternative energy sources but the venture capital community in Silicon Valley hasn't.

the drop in energy prices lowers development costs, and there is zero doubt about the long-term need for the alternatives to oil & natural gas.

how American businesses will make money when the fat margins associated with fossil fuel energy abundance dwindle away, i don't know.
http://www.LASIK-Flap.com/ ~ Health Warning about LASIK Eye Surgery
User avatar
pedalling_faster
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sat 10 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby sittinguy » Fri 31 Oct 2008, 08:56:01

I strated driving my old truck a few days ago again. Drove it to work today. 7 mpg.. Its fun to drive. Figure I better burn some gas while its cheaper. For now
User avatar
sittinguy
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Fri 07 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Is this the "worst case"?

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Fri 31 Oct 2008, 09:09:01

guy -- on behalf of myself and the rest of the oil patch: THANK YOU...THANK YOU...THANK YOU.

It's just human nature. We all enjoy our own brand of luxuries: driving...eating out...buying a new pair of shoes. We all know we should conserve but life without little joys isn't much fun. For me, I have enough different types of guns to handle any potential activity. But it still doesn't stop me from craving a new one I see at a great sale price. But that look I get from my better half does serve to hold me back some.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests