Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

What no 'Other' in the presidential elections

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

What no 'Other' in the presidential elections

Unread postby IslandCrow » Wed 05 Nov 2008, 11:00:19

I was just looking at MSN :oops: at the election results, and was struck that on the main maps, and the main pages I could not find any reference to the 1,5 million votes (1,1%) that according to the BBC pages went to 'Other'.

I know I should not expect much from MSN, :roll: but I find it shocking that they would ignore 1 500 000+ votes in their 'news' reporting.

[Mods please merge if necessary]
We should teach our children the 4-Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rejoice.
User avatar
IslandCrow
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Finland

Re: What no 'Other' in the presidential elections

Unread postby Loki » Wed 05 Nov 2008, 11:16:25

We're irrelevant. If you don't buy into the binary, you don't matter.
A garden will make your rations go further.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: What no 'Other' in the presidential elections

Unread postby CarlinsDarlin » Wed 05 Nov 2008, 12:33:43

Pretty much.
User avatar
CarlinsDarlin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1363
Joined: Fri 02 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: What no 'Other' in the presidential elections

Unread postby criticalmass » Wed 05 Nov 2008, 13:03:10

Yeah, where in the hell was my Nader/ Gonzalez vote!

I still haven't found results for anyone else.
User avatar
criticalmass
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu 20 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Colorado

Re: What no 'Other' in the presidential elections

Unread postby coyote » Wed 05 Nov 2008, 13:58:44

Complete results were posted in our local newspaper here, you might check yours to see if it's there.

All third parties received 0% rounded, except Peace and Freedom (Nader) which received 1%. If there's ever a chance for third parties to be anything more than strictly marginal - well, this election wasn't it. People were too excited about the main candidates.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: What no 'Other' in the presidential elections

Unread postby dissident » Wed 05 Nov 2008, 15:53:43

What is funny is how the US and western media think the US political pattern is some paragon of democracy but when similar consolidation of power into less than three parties occurs elsewhere it is evidence of authoritarianism. The fact that Obama has Brzezinksi and an open neocon on his team is not a good sign. Real change requires the behviour outside US borders to change and not just some token policy changes at home. I hope Obama will be a real president and not somebody's sock puppet like Bush. That would be great for the USA and the world.
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: What no 'Other' in the presidential elections

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 05 Nov 2008, 21:37:16

If Ron Paul had run as a 3rd party he surely would have gotten more than 1% of the vote.
mos6507
 


Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests