vtsnowedin wrote:8) page 3 paragraph 2 second sentence, either add the word oil or remove the word of.
Oooooops...
vtsnowedin wrote: I would take a long hard look at the work of Cooper you cite. Is demand really that inelastic? Also your discussion does not consider the availability of substitutes for oil. At what point dose a consumer of oil switch to substitutes that are known and begin to invest in the development of new substitutes?
My work was 2030 words long (remember, the limit was 1000) when I finished. I analysed 4 extra themes apart from those you see there:
- elasticity of demand may be different (long run, no constraints; people invest in capital equipment, like cars, than run on different sources of energy);
- The part of the price of oil that effectively impacts on fuel prices, and how it increases with the increase in cost of crude oil (48% average in the period from 2000 to 2007; 58% average in 2007) and how this could help the mentioned price elasticity of demand increase, by increasing the input elasticity of demand - oil is a product for the oil industry and an input for everyone else;
- The investment in alternatives effectively creates a substitution effect; I was going to create a new version on the price equation, accounting for this impact - investment in alternatives over time diminishes the shadow price of oil and diminishes the demand; so it could, after some point, contribute to diminishing the price of oil
- The impact of cartel behaviour - OPEC will rule the market as production from non-OPEC decreases and demand increase, ceteris paribus
Unfortunately, I ran out of words to say it all. I'm considering expanding it, depending on the teacher's input.
But thanks for the comments, it's great that people around here have that wholesome view of the problem; try discussing this in a pub with buddies and they'll thing the beer is going to your head.