"Once the price of money gets close to zero, what the Federal Reserve and other central banks can do is they embark on what's called quantitative easing, which is the provision of unlimited amounts of liquidity to the system to ensure the smooth operation of the economy," said Patricia Croft, chief economist at RBC Global Asset Management.
Federal Reserve Board chair Ben Bernanke said this week further cuts in the overnight rate are "certainly feasible," but hinted the central bank could use unorthodox methods to rev up the economy.
One option is to try to influence longer-term interest rates, a possibility Bernanke has raised.
Is this just their way of saying (in the first paragraph) that the printing press will run 24/7?
from here
Under normal circumstances, such massive injections of liquidity would carry the risk of inflation. But inflation isn't a fear right now because banks are holding on to their money, Croft said.
Does this seem odd? What does inflation have to do with banks holding on to their money? cause they aren't letting all the liquidity the government has just printed off out into the general economy?
Some economists caution deflation is becoming a real possibility as economies around the world contract. Deflation, a persistent, general decline in prices that can cause consumers to delay purchases in the hopes of prices going even lower, can prompt businesses to cut production and lay off staff, making demand fall even further.
So if central banks adopt near-zero rates, could that translate into lower interest rates for businesses and consumers?
"There's no guarantee that these interest rates move in lockstep,'' Smith warned. ``It depends on other parts of the financial system, whether banks are in a position to expand credit and lower their interest rates or not."
Well, if it isn't passed on to businesses and the consumer what the hell is the point? it wouldn't stimulate the economy if they don't...and isn't that the whole point in decreasing or dropping rates?