kpeavey wrote:I'd also want that crawlspace buttoned up and insulation under the floor.
LittleBoPeak wrote:Unfortunately, money is a concern. So with that in mind, would it make sense to go ahead with the insulation and wallboard in order to get liveable space now and then go back and do the tyvek maybe next year?
HeckuvaJob wrote:LittleBoPeak wrote:Unfortunately, money is a concern. So with that in mind, would it make sense to go ahead with the insulation and wallboard in order to get liveable space now and then go back and do the tyvek maybe next year?
Here is my advice based on your last post:
1. It was originally constructed as a shed so I'm assuming it's leaky. Therefore you can't choose between blocking air and insulating - you need both.
2. Dense-packed cellulose* is a cheap way to do both.
3. Use a double coat of primer like Zinser 123 on the interior drywall - this should be a sufficient vapor barrier for cold weather if you minimize internal moisture sources.
4. Skip the Tyvek. Since it's been standing for several months, you should be able to judge how weatherproof the exterior is and if any water is getting inside.
5. The upstairs ceiling/attic may be the most important factor in this equation and one that we don't have enough information on.
*Edit: this is a totally different technique than blowing it into the attic. A plastic tube is attached to the end of the nozzle and is fed into the wall cavity through a hole in the drywall. You slowly fill up the stud bay, densely packing in the cellulose and blocking any air leaks.
LittleBoPeak wrote:The building has been through several torrential rainstorms and I've seen no evidence of water getting in.
Are you saying that the cellulose is used instead of regular insulation? Is it an equivalent R rating to a comparable thickness of regular insulation?
As far as a vapor barrier, how about putting up plastic sheeting over the insulation, but under the wallboard? Would that be effective or would that create additional problems?
LittleBoPeak wrote:The building has been through several torrential rainstorms and I've seen no evidence of water getting in.
LittleBoPeak wrote:Are you saying that the cellulose is used instead of regular insulation? Is it an equivalent R rating to a comparable thickness of regular insulation?
Cellulose is “green.” It’s made of 80% post-consumer recycled newsprint. The fiber is chemically treated with non-toxic borate compounds (20% by weight) to resist fire, insects and mold. The common standard by which insulation is measured, R-value, is the level of resistance to heat flow. R-value measures conductive resistance – the ability of a material to impede the flow of heat along the continuous chain of matter that makes up a solid material. Most of a home’s heat is typically lost through conduction. Cellulose is not unusual in this regard. Like many insulation materials, it provides an R-value of approximately R-3.5 per inch of thickness. But, air leakage through cracks, voids, and gaps is important, responsible for approximately one-third of an average home’s heat loss. Cellulose is a superb air-blocker. Heat and comfort are also lost through convection; when drafty currents of air within the house, wall cavities or attics, move heat to other locations. This is technically different from air leakage where the heated air mass is actually expelled from the home. Tightly packed cellulose provides a thermally efficient, cost effective, and comfortable solution.
Blowing fiber into enclosed wall and cathedral framing cavities is different. Here a smaller 1- or 2-inch diameter fill tube is attached to the end of the larger hose. The fill tube is inserted into enclosed cavities through a series of strategically placed holes. The general idea is to drill a series of 2-inch holes horizontally across the structural surface so that the holes are centered in each framing cavity. One or more holes per framing bay are required depending on the length of the framing cavity and the applicator’s fill technique.
I'd be very leery of putting any plastic inside of a wall cavity for fear of mold. My job was a remodel so I didn't have a way of adding a vapor barrier (the Kraft paper of Kraft faced fiberglass batts) but I think the Zinser 123 primer is good substitute (I waterproofed a sheet of paper with a single coat as a test).LittleBoPeak wrote:As far as a vapor barrier, how about putting up plastic sheeting over the insulation, but under the wallboard? Would that be effective or would that create additional problems?
uNkNowN ElEmEnt wrote:Actually after all this talk I am thinking more about a kind of polyliner (its like bubble wrap) and reflects heat back in and acts as a vapour barrier. its supposed to give an R value of 9.5 for 2.5" thickness. for thinner walls that might be the way to go.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests