ReverseEngineer wrote:xerces wrote:$10M/year range is for mid level executives like Managing Directors. Any C-Level execs of major banks/Hedge funds would be rewarded closer to 100 million a year. This move is extremely unwise since it would drive out the best talent into non government controlled economic sector.
What "talent" exactly is it that you are referring to here? The talent to lose billions and make a mess of the economy? LOL.
And just what "Private Sector" jobs would these talented individuals remove themselves to now? Every freaking company of any size at all is getting Goobermint Bailouts, there no longer EXISTS a "private sector"!
If these geniuses can go out and start a new company and make $100M, please feel FREE, be my GUEST! Good Luck! If this was so easy for talented Pigmen, just why is it they don't do that instead of offing themselves when their Hedge Funds go Belly Up?
Reverse Engineer
Perhaps I should have ended my post with a </sarcasm> tag to be more clear. There are still profitable sectors outside of Financial and Automotive that are still not on the government dole. To name several:
Consulting
Law
Marketing/Product Development
Energy (Conventional+Alternative))
Technology
As I have mentioned in another post, the operating assumptions of the Financial services sector is messed up right now. Their executive "talent" would destabilize the healthy sectors of the broader economy. So for example, in my field(consulting), the profit growth is tied purely to the organic growth of our clients. As such if our annual profit growth is 5% a year, it's a decent year. If it's 8% or even 10%, it's incredibly good growth that everyone knows cannot be maintained over the long term. This is a lesson that most other professional sectors understand (tech and consulting even more than the others due to the IT bubble)
But Ex-Finance guys would look at these numbers and scoff. They are used to growth rates of 50% a year. Such growth can be achieved for a few years only if you rig the entire system. This of course causes bubbles and crashes as we have seen in the past. From the lower-level Financial people(mostly VPs) who have transitioned to consulting, I've seen a lot of complaining and fairly outrageous business pitches to clients to secure bigger bonuses.
Now if their bosses (exec-directors, Managing Directors, C-Level people) all transitioned into other sectors such as consulting(due to a pay cap). Then the overall direction of these sectors would be skewed towards unsustainable short term profit growth. It would literally destroy several still-healthy sectors of the economy. Thus, this move is unwise.