Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

CERA Vs. IEA - Spare Capacity Outlook

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

CERA Vs. IEA - Spare Capacity Outlook

Unread postby TheDude » Fri 27 Feb 2009, 16:59:05

And in this corner...

OPEC's spare capacity looks likely to grow. Thanks to investment in the boom years, the world's productive capacity should grow faster between 2009 and 2012 than it did from 2003 to 2008, said a report from U.S.-based consultancy Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

Companies May Face Massive Cash Outflows

If companies do not reduce their upstream investment at all during the current economic downturn, CERA said spare capacity could reach 10 million barrels a day by 2013. "This would be an unprecedented margin and would tend to undermine the oil price," the consultancy said.


RIGZONE - Oil Cos' Bet on Swift Price Rebound Has Its Risks

The International Energy Agency fears that an expected recovery in oil demand from 2010 and oil project cancellations due to low crude prices and the credit crisis will mean no spare oil capacity at the end of 2013.

"That is our concern. Investment, investment, investment, that is what we are asking," IEA Executive Director Nabuo Tanaka said at a conference in Lisbon on Friday.


IEA says oil capacity crunch looms - Upstreamonline

With such diametrically opposed outcomes, what's a person to think? Neither agency have been really on the ball with prognostications, so perhaps the answer is in the middle...or CERA's deliberately qualified statement is a hedge on their bet, in awareness of past shortcomings. And waddya know, ASPO has a new piece on CERA's cloudy crystal ball, too: CERA - a peak oiler in the making?

CERA makes a big issue out of their fantastic database, that it is why their forecasts are so superior to everyone else’s. If they are far away from other forecasts the reason is simply that they claim they have much better data to back up their views.

It is therefore an interesting experiment to size them up in a country where the data is simple, transparent and public, and where “a better database” therefore is not really a competitive edge. Let us take Norway. In their 2005 report they were expecting Norway to produce 3 million b/d of liquids in 2010. In their 2006 update this figure had been revised up to 3.15 million b/d.

According to the latest IEA figures and the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate it is expected that Norway to produce about 2.1 million b/d in 2010. This actually means that in 2006 CERA was more than 50% too high in their estimate for capacity 4 years down the road for a country with relatively few fields and the most transparent and public statistics in the world.


So, my bet's on a very tight market, sooner if not later.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: CERA Vs. IEA - Spare Capacity Outlook

Unread postby copious.abundance » Fri 27 Feb 2009, 21:55:40

In other words, no one has a clue.

"It's Hard To Make Predictions, Especially About the Future"

- Mark Twain -
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: CERA Vs. IEA - Spare Capacity Outlook

Unread postby truecougarblue » Sat 28 Feb 2009, 01:02:06

"If companies do not reduce their upstream investment"

Considering this is fait acompli at this point I'm going with the IEA, and sooner rather than later.
User avatar
truecougarblue
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed 21 Dec 2005, 04:00:00


Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests