patience wrote:I'm afraid the poor countries are going to be on their own, with protectionism running rampant soon. Globalization was not the best idea from the start, IMHO, and the furious pace of expansion and shifts inside poorer countries will make the fallback harder on them. All those Chinese who moved to the industrial cities don't have much to go back to, and nothing where they are when their job goes away.
With the spoiled populations in the richer places clamoring to maintain their status quo, politicians bent on retaining the position of power will look first to appeasing their constituents, and relegate foreign aid to history.
TWilliam wrote:"Foreign aid" is more often than not a polite euphemism for "capitalist exploitation".
mos6507 wrote:TWilliam wrote:"Foreign aid" is more often than not a polite euphemism for "capitalist exploitation".
Care to elaborate?
mos6507 wrote:Care to elaborate?
World Bank Issues Dire Warning On Global Economy
mos6507 wrote:Care to elaborate? At what point should countries that have reached the level of Soylent Brown be expected to stand on their own two feet?
Ludi wrote:They are expected to conveniently die.
TWilliam wrote:You are very likely going to learn the hard way that charity and largesse, and the liberal idealism that drive them, are largely a product of surplus
Ludi wrote:No doubt. Just don't YOU come around here, because I will kick you in the balls, or shoot you. But I will by no means help you, TWilliam.
In other words, fuck off.
deMolay wrote:Pretty harsh Ludi.
mos6507 wrote:TWilliam wrote:"Foreign aid" is more often than not a polite euphemism for "capitalist exploitation".
Care to elaborate? At what point should countries that have reached the level of Soylent Brown be expected to stand on their own two feet?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests