by ian807 » Mon 13 Apr 2009, 16:03:08
I grew up in a town smaller than Roundrock and have lived in a few others since as well as some large cities. None of what the author describes surprises me, but my perspective is a little different.
There is an effective apartheid. It's not because the newcomers are newcomers as such. There are a number of unavoidable differences.
In my hometown, there were 3000 people. Jobs had already started moving to Asia. Well paying jobs became sparse. The few local industries that stayed employed people for low-wage manufacturing jobs.
So what happened? Anyone with intelligence, ambition, enough money, and some get-up-and go, got up and went! What was left in the rural areas was.... what was left. Not a flattering portrait, but accurate in many of the places I've seen. It started happening in the 70s mostly as industry migrated, but it's going on today.
So, we have two classes of people, separated by intelligence, ambition and eventually wealth, with all the cultural differences that implies (Folgers vs. Starbucks, camouflage vs khaki), and as elites everywhere do, they tend to run roughshod over those with less ability to fight back. It's not pretty no, but the local populace, I can assure you, is no great prize either.
Are small towns sustainable? In the long run, I think some will. Peak oil will kill off the ones that aren't. And then it won't matter *who* you are.