Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby deMolay » Thu 21 May 2009, 09:48:59

Incredibly the Guru's and Spin Doctor's keep saying that Tings are getting better. I think this chart says otherwise. http://www.chartoftheday.com/20090515.htm
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby AAA » Thu 21 May 2009, 11:40:54

Interesting BUT I have been buying the S&P 500 over the last 4 months and turned much of that back into cash by selling it at great profits.

So I would actually disagree with your misleading topic title. :)
How can Ludi spend 8-10 hrs/day on the internet and claim to be homesteading???
User avatar
AAA
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed 12 Nov 2008, 04:00:00

Re: S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby deMolay » Thu 21 May 2009, 13:46:28

It really doesn't matter if you agree or if you made or lost money. The fact is it is down.
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Thu 21 May 2009, 13:49:18

DeMolay, you are wrong.

Profits may be down 90%, but the market value of the index is not.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby Kristen » Thu 21 May 2009, 17:19:53

Must be rough to even have money to buy stocks. I thought we all agreed money was worthless anyway? It doesn't really measure a real value of assets anymore.

It's interesting that we have a society that lives in a complete fictional "economics" system. Perhaps economics itself, like psychology, are fictional sciences within themselves. Just my two cents, no pun intended.
User avatar
Kristen
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby gt1370a » Thu 21 May 2009, 21:11:51

That's S&P EARNINGs and it includes the hundreds of billions of dollars in losses from AIG and banks. Whether it is appropriate to include or exclude those losses or weight them somehow is debatable.... anyway I think the chart is a little misleading.

Siegel weighs in for whatever that's worth:
http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/futureinvest/153794
User avatar
gt1370a
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00

Re: S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby shortonoil » Mon 25 May 2009, 21:11:15

Kristen said:

Must be rough to even have money to buy stocks. I thought we all agreed money was worthless anyway? It doesn't really measure a real value of assets anymore.

It's interesting that we have a society that lives in a complete fictional "economics" system. Perhaps economics itself, like psychology, are fictional sciences within themselves. Just my two cents, no pun intended.


I have to agree totally with you Kristen. The market has completely disconnected from fundamentals. In spite of this divergence no one cares, even though it is a very clear indication that the system that people are using to make their money has ended. When reality itself becomes insignificant to individuals, the society has obviously gone a little off the rails.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA

Re: S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby odegaard » Wed 27 May 2009, 02:33:32

AAA wrote:Interesting BUT I have been buying the S&P 500 over the last 4 months and turned much of that back into cash by selling it at great profits.
Once again you seem to be suffering from a severe case of ***selective memory***
As I have mentioned before, we have a subsection on this forum called "Stock Markets Current News III (Take Two)" where people can make their investment announcements in real time and we can all check back at a later date to see how good a person really is or maybe they're just blowing hot air out of their ass.
The thread exists for a reason. Having a centralized thread makes it easier for everyone else to cross-reference a person's claim.

I check the thread everyday but not surprisingly I don't remember you being very active in there.
This does not surprise me. :roll:
"They're not too big to fail, they're too big to bail out!" Peter Schiff
odegaard
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 382
Joined: Tue 21 Apr 2009, 00:36:50

Re: S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby AAA » Wed 27 May 2009, 11:27:45

odegaard wrote:I check the thread everyday but not surprisingly I don't remember you being very active in there.
This does not surprise me. :roll:


haha. Did someone pay you to harass me? :)
How can Ludi spend 8-10 hrs/day on the internet and claim to be homesteading???
User avatar
AAA
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed 12 Nov 2008, 04:00:00

Re: S&P Actually Down 90% Over Last 20 Months

Unread postby odegaard » Wed 27 May 2009, 11:31:23

AAA wrote:haha. Did someone pay you to harass me? :)
No not really.
But I'm open to the idea. 8) [smilie=naka.gif]
"They're not too big to fail, they're too big to bail out!" Peter Schiff
odegaard
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 382
Joined: Tue 21 Apr 2009, 00:36:50


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests