by Schmuto » Wed 03 Jun 2009, 12:24:49
I'm an attorney.
I don't give legal advice on the Internet, but, for what it's worth, here's how I'd handle any such interaction . . .
Cop comes up and asks question . . .
Start - - -
Path A -
Me - What's this about?
Cop - Any answer other than exactly what this is about.
Me - I'm sorry officer, I have nothing to say unless I know exactly what this is about.
Path B -
Me - What's this about?
Cop - Tells me what this is about and there is zero doubt that it implicates me at all (this includes any hint whatsover that the cop/fed is lying about what this is about).
Me - Help out - it's my moral and civic duty, but understanding that any question that hints that the cop/fed is interested in my whereabouts/behavior, etcetera immediately ends the conversation.
Path C -
Me - What's this about?
Cop - Tells me what this is about and there is even a remote chance it implicates me.
Me - I'm sorry officer, I have nothing to say about this matter.
And that's it.
I'm prepared for cop bullying threats - "show me your ID" or "I'll arrest you for [whatever - cops usually don't know more than basics about the law]"
If I'm not going to make my Constitutional stand, I show my ID or just shrug at the arrest threat.
He wants to arrest me? Great. I can use all the easy lawsuit money some fool wants to throw at me.
He wants to see my ID? Fine. On some day in the future I might peacefully protest that request, but today, no issue.
But I say nothing. Not a word.
Remember Schmuto's Golden Rule of police/federal interrogation:
They can legally tell you any lie, and, accordingly, no word they speak should be considered true. If you lie to them, however, that is, in and of itself, a crime, and you can be put in jail for it.
Don't lie to the Feds/Cops.
June 5, 09. Taking a powder for at least a while - big change of life coming up.
-
We're saved! YesPlease promises that we'll be running cars on battery cubes about the size of a toaster.