energyhoggin wrote:well i understand peak oil, its the point were production levels off even though they have only pumped less than one half the amount of oil in the ground, the next stage is decline. That offshore oil in the persian gulf is what i was talking about there is a lot of oil reserves in the gulf accourding to some sources, whether its been fully tapped or fully exploited is a matter up to question.
that "question" is part of the peak oil definition. there may be eons' worth of oil way down deep..under the sea..under the crust...where the dragons live and ships of yore search eternally for salvation.
the concept there is, how much energy does it require to recover and refine that good stuff?
if it takes 1 barrel to recover 1 barrel, then it isn't worth the effort, and you abandon that well. the oil might as well be on Jupiter.
many folks like to think that they can cheat physics and claim there's "some new technology that will be invented" that will make it all work.
A. the tech needed to recover that oil with a positive EROI exists mainly on cocktail napkins or in a beaker somewhere, and B. Technology is itself a user of energy, a part these theorists never factor in.
Probably too much television, most likely Star Trek, has taught these individuals that yankee know-how and elbow grease are all that's needed to change the laws of physics and have a never-ending supply of magical energy.
the thing is, if we could do all that stuff they claim we'll be able to do with recovering the hard-to-reach oil....we wouldn't NEED the freakin' oil!
z