But, I question the definitions.
First off, they seem to equate "hunger" with having to forego anything one's appetite would want.
While it does not surprise me that in a time of a harsh recession that the true hunger rate would increase, it seems hard to comprehend the one in six figure.
Too bad the other two or three in six who are overeating consistently could not set aside their next trip for pizzas or wings or burgers and give the equivalent amount they would spend for fast food or a fancy meal and give the money for canned goods or non-perishable beans or lentils to a food bank. It oculd buy many times the good value equivalent. I may do just that myself, maybe set aside $5 or $10 a week, and it could be a win-win, for me and the recipient of the food.
But, once again, government is rushing in. Maybe for good, maybe for bad....how sustainable are food programs over time? The Romans showed that dependency on government is not a sustainable option for an urban society.
Government report shows 15% of Americans had trouble putting food on the table -- a record high. By David Goldman, CNNMoney.com staff writer. Last Updated: November 16, 2009: 3:32 PM ET:
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The number of Americans that have trouble putting food on the table shot up last year in an unprecedented spike to a record 17 million households, the government reported on Monday.
In 2007, 13 million households or 11.1% of Americans had trouble getting enough food. The one-year jump is all the more significant, given the number of hungry Americans had never been higher than 11.9% since these surveys began.
Of the near-15% of the nation that couldn't secure enough food last year, the USDA said one-third of them had "very low food security," meaning they reduced the amount that they ate or disrupted their eating patterns during the year. That group made up 5.7% of all U.S. households, which was also a record high.
More than 500,000 households that scaled back the amount that they ate were households with children, making up 1.3% of all U.S. homes with children.
Obama's call to action. President Obama called the report "unsettling," and said more needs to be done. "My Administration is committed to reversing the trend of rising hunger," Obama said in a statement. "The first task is to restore job growth, which will help relieve the economic pressures that make it difficult for parents to put a square meal on the table each day. But we are also taking targeted steps to prevent Americans from experiencing hunger."
Obama urged Congress to pass a "strong" child nutrition bill to help ensure that American children don't go hungry.
To combat the nation's rapidly growing hunger problem, the Recovery Act allocated $20 billion to the nation's food stamp program, and hundreds of millions of dollars to food banks and school lunch programs. One recipient of stimulus funds was the USDA's Emergency Food Assistance Program, which was allocated an additional $150 million from the $787 billion economic stimulus plan.