sjn wrote:You can fully understand the desire of the USGOV/FED wanting to tax the economic output of the rest of the world by charging them for the privilege of holding US "assets", but to say it's insane to think it will fly really isn't strong enough. Where I disagree with the TAE writers is I think this will further undermine international confidence in the US$, even while domestically there is a run to cash, the net result will lead to that US financial isolation you mentioned above.
Yes, but in the 'crash' the world will flee to the 'safety'
of the $. Which, btw, will 'allow' for the rest of the world
to keep flooding the US with manufactured abroad goods.
Which will then 'force' the US into further actions. Thus
unlike the previous 100 years, the US becomes the one
that is reacting to world events.
We move from the Visible of Newtonian electromechanics
to the Invisible of Quantum Physics.
Ex: Congress and POTUS are working together:
January 30, 2010
In a surprisingly swift move on Thursday night that could have wide-ranging implications, the U.S. Senate passed a bill containing broad unilateral sanctions to punish foreign companies that export gasoline to Iran or help expand its domestic refinery capabilities.
Clinton said from now on, China will be under “a lot of pressure” to accompany the US campaign.
"As we move away from the engagement track, which has not produced the result that some had hoped for, and move forward on the pressure and sanctions track, China will be under a lot of pressure to recognize the destabilizing impact that a nuclear-armed Iran would have in the Persian Gulf, from which they receive a significant percentage of their oil supplies.”
But I don't think China sees it that way:
China warns U.S. about arms sales to Taiwan 09:0330/01/2010 China summoned the U.S. ambassador on Saturday warning him about consequences for bilateral relations of planned arms sales to Taiwan.