by pup55 » Fri 15 Jan 2010, 13:26:42
Well, let's see, 8 years, 2002, oil has gone from 20 to 80 so that's about right.
There's a whole array of people that produce the intermediate products, I am thinking stuff like styrene and ethylene.... that then are turned into the petrochemical products downstream, and the less labor dependent they are, the closer they will track the price of oil, since a lot of these are continuous processes that do not actually require much human input. Anything that takes some human component, tires for example, did not have such a big increase because a lot of it is done in China.
These guys have a little leeway on pricing their products, not much, because in most of these businesses there are a few big aggressive competitors, and there is overcapacity in all of these industries because of what happened in automotive for all of those years......Many of them are just as badly off as the oil refiners are right now..
A lot of this stuff was expanded in the 90's based on the assumption, put out by the EIA a government agency, that the worst case scenario would be that oil will get to $35 a barrel.....and we would all drive Ford Explorers.
So in a world like we have seen the last 18 months, where oil has gone fro 147 to 33 and now back up to 80, the assumptions that people built into their business and product pricing model went totally out the window. They also have the problem of getting money to refinance their plants when their bonds come due....about now....
So the whole thing is a mess, particularly for these gigantic operations that need a lot of capital and some steady pricing and a lot of other things in order to run a business.....
I suppose you could eventually see an evolution back to smaller and more flexible companies in this market, such as what happened in the steel industry when Nucor grew up in the 80's.....but that means that you can expect to pay more to the survivors who can manage to make a business out of this disaster.