efarmer wrote:1 egg from Ludi's chicken coop if the Datsun pickup is not around
Humanity may have landed a man on the moon, but nothing compares with two cans of creamed corn for under a buck.
Ainan wrote:Read the article this morning deMolay, linked from your other article.
Fantastic quote:Humanity may have landed a man on the moon, but nothing compares with two cans of creamed corn for under a buck.
I was working on a document detailing every last scrap of information on long term food storage last year, I will have to dig it out and finish it some time. Would anyone here be interested in reading such a document?
the48thronin wrote:Ainan wrote:Read the article this morning deMolay, linked from your other article.
Fantastic quote:Humanity may have landed a man on the moon, but nothing compares with two cans of creamed corn for under a buck.
I was working on a document detailing every last scrap of information on long term food storage last year, I will have to dig it out and finish it some time. Would anyone here be interested in reading such a document?
yes
Yeah, lazy people should probably just starve to death.MarkJ wrote:Not only is food dirt cheap, but it's free for many people due to food stamps, WIC, free school lunches, food bank supplements etc.
When poor unemployed people can afford to feed their cats solid white albacore tuna, let food spoil and toss so much uneaten food in the garbage, you know food is way, way, way too cheap.
deMolay wrote:Peak Oil and Food. http://screambucket.com/index.php?optio ... &Itemid=98
Ludi, if I'm good at reading your mind, I too am so-so with Mark's first paragraph. But I think he's on to something with the second. Case in point, a relative earns $40K, his wife stays home, they have a cat and a dog, a van, a car, and a motorcycle, they go to an aunt's house on a weekly basis for hand-me down groceries, they buy a 6-pack nearly every night, and the guy is overweight.Ludi wrote:Yeah, lazy people should probably just starve to death.MarkJ wrote:Not only is food dirt cheap, but it's free for many people due to food stamps, WIC, free school lunches, food bank supplements etc.
When poor unemployed people can afford to feed their cats solid white albacore tuna, let food spoil and toss so much uneaten food in the garbage, you know food is way, way, way too cheap.
They get free food from an aunt instead of stealing it? You tell me.VMarcHart wrote:Food is so cheap, that they can afford to divert their meager money towards cat and dog food, to leisure gasoline, other people can afford to buy extra food for them, beer, and they still overweight. What's wrong with that picture?
I think the root issue here is with our society's values. Food prices after all, reflect supply and demand (and yes, this gets skewed by government meddling, like many other things).Ludi wrote:Really, I'm not sure what your point is except some people spend money in a way you don't approve of? Does that mean food is too cheap? Or that everything is too cheap? Or what?
Sure, I have a beef with the way some people spend money, and money being a quantative image of resources, the way some people spend resources.Ludi wrote:Really, I'm not sure what your point is except some people spend money in a way you don't approve of? Does that mean food is too cheap?
But our society throws away about 50% of the food. Can we as a society put a higher value on food without starving the poor? If we give food away, that seems to diminish its value. But at the same time, it's not legal to get food from dumpsters. So it's not legal for people to get food for themselves that nobody else wants.VMarcHart wrote:I see food as way too affordable, that even the poor can afford to disrespect its value.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests