EFarmer made a nice rant in the Vermillion Bay thread and for whatever reason it made me think of the effort expended for North Slope oil in the '70s, Iraqi oil in the aughties and deepwater now.
Building the Alaska Pipeline was hard but easy and cheap compared to liberating Iraq's oil. Of course Cheney didn't have as much control as he needed but he gave it a shot. The guys that work the oil rigs I'd guess are mostly the same guys that worked the pipeline and the 50 cal. in Iraq.
I was just out of high school when they started the Alaska pipe and it was really a big deal as I remember. Right on the heels of the first Arab embargoes, the 'mericns got out the Drill, Baby, and got to work! It's no wonder Boomers have a hard time believing we'll ever run low on oil, all we need is a little gumption, a bulldozer and a few less environmentalists gumming up the works.
A quick search indicates the Alaska pipe and terminal would cost about $30B today - the Iraq resource development tab is up to $750B I think (not including oil infrastructure) and four thousands lives (Iraqis don't count) and we're not even back to pre-freedom oil extraction levels yet. That's a good indication of how far down the depletion road we've come. In fact the piddling (and I'm sure to Cheney, disappointing) amount of oil coming out of Iraq today is about the same as was coming out of the pipe at the peak of it's delivery - that indicates how much our requirements for oil have grown.
The cost of heroic measures to keep the old alcoholic alive is growing all the time.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/10 ... l-20100810