I don't mean to suggest that there is a cabal of the super wealthy sitting somewhere in a huddle scheming our manipulation. However, taken together, I suspect that anyone in control of significant amounts of capital tends to act in concert with others in a similar predicament. For one thing, there is an entire industry resourcing the investing industry with a whole array of advisories. In addition, aspiring members of the elite tend to emulate those they view as established members. So collectively, there is a sort of uniformity of behaviour that gives this group certain indentifiable features. They consist of a collection of various types from old nobility, to the noveau riche and all the managers of the various funds and mutualities in between.
The world post the Cold War has been ordered to facilitae the free flow of their investments under the terms of the WTO. They have co-opted whole swathes of what were previously nationalist and state capitalist cadres, in the process absorbing them into their ranks thereby swelling them. All of this is functioning reasonably favourably at the moment given the vast surplus value locked up in the remaining oil reserves as well as the huge armies of manufacturing and service personnel in Asia. These people are truly sitting on a gold mine at the moment hence the apparent paradox of relative stability despite the convulsions of the recent bailout.
At some time in the future (and I reckon it is possibly around the middle of this century) we will see this surplus dry up as commodity reserves dwindle and labour costs rise. It is at this point, I anticipate the rise of strong socialist sentiment. I suspect there will be an organic awareness in the masses that with each passing year, growth is slowing for reasons no one is capable of controlling. None of the ideologies that promise abundance will stand up to scrutiny including the Fascists which is why I suspect that there will be a swing to anti-private and communitarian ideas. The masses will sense, by herd instinct, that drastic limits will be required for all the reasons that will make sense then and seem so alien now.
Obviously there will be the rise of opportunistic politics but when confronted by the arrival of limits, I think their very failure to articulate coherent policies will serve to emphasise the dire predicament of the commons.
Newfie wrote:americandream wrote:Thats all correct until you have the cards stacked in the favour of the wealthy who buy and sell politicians and are so widely dispersed that nationalism means nothing to them. In such an instance, all the old reasoning from the days of protectionism really do not apply. For example, who really owns the US, China, India, Japan, the UK, etc, etc. And don't tell me its the Jews, bankers, reptiles or some such other nonsense. These countries are essentialy subject to the whims of the large pools of monies in the hands of funds and well off individuals and families. In that instance, irrespective of who gets the oil, global capital ultimately benefits. If the national and regional governments act in whatever capacity, its to serve those masters despite apearances.
This lot paid a high price to win the Cold War and bring the world to heel. You don't think they are simply going to hand their hard won gains over to some manager in India or China, do you? Any fiscal policy applied works to that end, whether its to provide temporary relief to the masses or encourage their indebtedness so as they may continue consuming.
Cheers
Humm, not sure of the argument here. I don't have this worked out in detail, no one has. We will have to see how it goes.
The 'wealthy' may not be so wealth anymore. If the financial game collapses then they take a big hurt. Those that own things of importance: farms, water rights, oil rights, factories, they may be the ones on top. True, for you and I it is a reordering at that top that still leaves us under someones boot.
But then, there are sooooo may of the masses. A popular uprising could be in the works (think 2015/2016) with some real wing nut in the running for President. At what point do the Fascist take over? What then is the value of 'wealth'?
All I'm saying is that in a global trade war the value of money is degraded and the value of barter increases. And the US has a pretty good position vis a vis the competition. Any thing beyond that is wild speculation, which is fun, but not terribly useful.[/quote]