"Advanced imaging technology screening is optional for all passengers," TSA said in a statement released Monday. "Passengers who opt out of [advanced imaging] screening will receive alternative screening, including a physical pat-down."
But anyone who refuses to complete the screening process will be denied access to airport secure areas and could be subject to civil penalties, the administration said, citing a federal appeals court ruling in support of the rule.
The ruling, from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, says that "requiring that a potential passenger be allowed to revoke consent to an ongoing airport security search makes little sense in a post-9/11 world.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/11/15/california.airport.security/index.html
Personally I wouldn't have a problem with a pat-down. It shouldn't be a big deal.. these TSA officers are patting people down all day every day, do people really think they are such hot stuff that the TSA officer is getting a thrill out of it?
They should just have some common sense rules.. only women should pat down women (I think they already do that). And another good idea would be to erect some privacy cubicles.. maybe folks would feel better about the pat down if they didn't have a whole airport of people gawking at them. Getting a pat-down is embarrassing.. take that nun in the pic above for example. They really need to have screened off private spaces.
Another idea.. maybe hire nurses to do the pat-downs. That way the folks doing this would already be trained and have experience at privacy-invading procedures like this. That could be the real problem here, undoubtedly there are some real yahoos working for TSA and people just don't want to be groped by folks like that.