Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada wrote:Does Political Correctness in modern culture equal an anti-Christian movement? .
I observe some increase of PC related activity while we are approaching collapse of current paradigm.
You should expect more and more such activities while Liberal system approaches its end.
And obviously once it is gone there will be retaliations from another side and orthodox Christians will paddle back their agenda
ian807 wrote:"PC" probably isn't the correct term, but incidents like removing nativity scenes from public buildings was an attempt to get government out of the religion business. The motivation was fairness. Since you can't sponsor every religion, you sponsor none, and leave religion to individuals and private organizations.
Cog wrote:Ahh so only stupid people are religious? How PC of you to say so.
Ludi wrote:The government is not allowed to "sponsor" ANY religion. Can't promote it, can't discourage it.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Ludi wrote:Some of the smartest people I know are religious. My dad, my sister, my sister's husband, my husband's oldest sister are all definitely of above-average intelligence, all quite religious.
ian807 wrote:Quite so, and this is the crux of the matter. When the local government in Backwoods, PA pays for a nativity scene or the 10 commandments to be placed on the publicly funded courthouse lawn while rejecting a similar setup from the local pastafarians, satanists, mormons or shatnerites it is effectively "making a law respecting an establishment of religion" even if it's not written into legislation.
And do you want local bureaucrats determining what religious displays are allowed on public property? What about cases where the catholic display prominently showing Mary gets rejected by the local baptist contingent? Even between christian sects, this could get quite ugly.
SeaGypsy wrote:Churches are hungry and compliant.
The most compliant is the biggest; hence the business model.
pstarr wrote:The Baby Jesus is not pushy.
Return to Open Topic Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests