FRANCIS: Whatever happened to the Popular Front, Reg?
REG: He's over there.
P.F.J.: Splitter!
teotwawki wrote:No, really... This is a serious question.
teotwawki wrote:No, really... This is a serious question. I was first introduced to the whole "peak oil" thing back in 2006 when I accidentally bumped into Matt Savinar's LOTAC website while searching for articles on population overshoot. It scared the crap out of me and well from there the rest was history. Like most people on here I read up on as much about Peak Oil and the likes as I could get my hands on.. Joined a couple of Peak Oil forums (including this one) and got banned by an admin or two.. but overall it was all cool and a great experience...
teotwaeki wrote:And low and behold, Matt abandoned his sheeple and cut lifesupport from this doomer.us forum and did an about face, reverse 180 and into some quackery astrologists pseudo black magic, abracadabra hocus pocus psychobabble.
eXpat wrote:There´s no such a thing as a peak oil movement, there´s just a group of people.....
thuja wrote:The Peak Oil "Movement"?
2008 was the year the fast crashers lost their momentum and us slow crashers are still here...preaching the gospel the plateauing and imminent decline in global oil production will spell economic calamity and lead to a myriad of problems such as social unrest, riots, revolutions and wars. It will also lead (already has) to extreme oil price volatility and will hasten recessions and depressions.
thuja wrote:
Goodbye apocolyptic preacher men. Hello rank and file smart people who know that Peak Oil is bad for bizness...
thuja wrote:Those who deny that are...idiots...
anador wrote:We outsourced it to China.....
They have been spending most of their money in Energy commodity investment lately.
thuja wrote:Goodbye apocolyptic preacher men. Hello rank and file smart people who know that Peak Oil is bad for bizness...
Those who deny that are...idiots...
AirlinePilot wrote:Geeze, Xeno..not the Volt crap again. Any car that can only go 40 miles on some ridiculously expensive battery pack which you'll have to replace in 5 years and then has a GASOLINE ENGINE in it for the next 350 miles is a stupid science project. Its a failure before it leaves the lot.
AirlinePilot wrote: At a cost of 41K minus the government credit, I can buy a very fuel efficient small vehicle for about half the price and have enough money left over for gas and DO EXACTLY THE SAME THING with it consumption wise as far as fuel goes and never have to worry about the batteries having to be replaced.
AirlinePilot wrote:What they need to be doing is finding a way to build and market cars which get 50-70mpg. I want to buy one right now..but cant!
AirlinePilot wrote: Its no wonder they are only selling a few hundred a month. Any sane thinking person wouldn't begin to think this vehicle is a smart decision. Its nothing more than a monument to Detroit's stupidity and a reminder of how woefully bad battery storage technology currently is. What they need to be doing is finding a way to build and market cars which get 50-70mpg. I want to buy one right now..but cant!
pstarr wrote:I don't recall your actually standing up for Xeno. You may not be the brightest bulb in the socket but I gather you have more sense than that.
Xeno's claims (to have either purchased an EV or a bought a prius conversion) are no more than distractions, designed to further his agenda--convincing others that we can continue to burn fossil fuels with impunity. You realize that he is a AGW and evolution denier?
I believe you have been conned.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests