by the48thronin » Fri 25 Feb 2011, 12:50:27
The last "spike" left behind results including the banishment of the number of different items stocked in Walmart by 50%, that change doubled the flexibility of their JIT system at the cost of fewer products available for sale in each store. The change in JIT structures of the surviving big box stores, and the failure of several distribution networks proved the necessity for loosening JIT schedules and gaining that flexibility.
Trucking was saved from imminent collapse when the collapsing economy reduced the price of fuel so precipitously that survivors were able to creep along remaining in business. Government stimulus and green grants helped many of the bigger carriers to pretend to make smaller losses. After a year profits were wrung from every book keeping trick in the book. A chorus of "the recovery is at hand has disguised the slowed failure of transportation infrastructures. Make no mistake, kicking the can has almost finished, the end of the road you can kick it down might be in sight.
Union give backs saved for now the giant LTL carrier that invested too many marbles in the China to store drop shipment idea. But businesses representing the major manufacturing systems from Auto to home appliance have continued to trickle off shore in search of greater shares of the "developing Asia market". Meanwhile that LTL carrier continues to slowly fail. In a reversal of norm, the advanced age of much of their equiptment has actually helped them aviod the low fuel mileage and high mantanence issues other carriers are dealing with.
Back here in the USA the green mandates have been either put on hold by states that ordered them, ( as their fuel guzzling aspects and defective technology became apparent), subsidized by grants ( in the name of emission free or hybrid establishment), or subsidized by a can kicking 100 percent depreciation in one year schemes.
None of the underlying problems have actually been successfully addressed. Transportation taxes are still being diverted from freight carrying systems to exotic rail passenger projects, museums, or any other pet project of dubious value that cannot attract private financing. The ankles of the economic colossus are still shattered, the tipping slowed with the decrease in fuel costs, however those ankles are still shattered.
80% of all food and end user freight is still dependent on small ( less than 6 owned) fleets for transportation, in fact many of the bigger fleets survived only by adopting a cost sharing "fleece purchase" scheme putting the burden on ever smaller less able to stand a shock "independent" contractors.
The push of higher cost SPIKES will re-accelerate that tipping. Debt service for smaller operators may well be the fulcrum as "independent" ( yeah right) contractors face the choices. The choices facing many are how to pay for operating cost increases without increased revenue, send money home so the wife and kids can eat ( yes that cost is also growing), or pay your quarterlies to the ravenous overlords. The primary debt for the tractor lease will be extracted from earnings before the contractor ever sees them by the nature of the slave collar relationship with their debtor and masters at the carrier they lease to and get revenue from. The failure rate from these "fleece purchases is high by design, but with this price spike it may reach cataclysmic proportions quickly. Most of the "fleece purchase" operators I talk to are taking home "no pay due" already 3 out of 4 weeks at a time due to maintenance factors. Their fingers are clinging to the rock wall as they hang from the cliff, but the family at home is beyond struggling and the Tax man is forgotten for the moment. That situation has one outcome unless costs regress or revenue goes up.
The largest JIT carrier in the USA brags that it owns not one truck. They purchased many smaller and mid sized carriers at the distress sales caused by the last spike. That tactic has a limited ability to help them replace the failure rates they are about to experience. Those carriers they purchased that owned trucks found themselves forced into "fleece purchase schemes or to layoffs of drivers as their trucks were sold.
A second problem related to the 05 to 07 emissions technology failures, and the 08 and 09 motor defects caused by emissions reduction technology, and the more rapid than usual transfer of that defective equipment from fleet owners to "independent contractors" would be too technical to fully include, but I will add the statement that unlike previous failure rates in the secondary small truck sector, the failure of that equipment is preordained to make failure rates in that sector of the industry that actually delivers the majority of food from farm/cooler/packer to DC extremely high as the defects cause catastrophic failures to those people unable to handle that financial strain the most. There is a reason Caterpillar has withdrawn from the class 8 motor market. That reason and related issues might in fact be the tipping point as it matures as those trucks reach the 500k mile era where fleets usually dump trucks off into the used fleets. Many of those trucks are available now with 300 to 350k miles of use because they original carrier purchaser knows the math on failure of those drive trains. 2010 motors are in fact already becoming known for their own systemic failures.
Malthusian Riders Member!
Courtesy and Courage Sincerity and Self-control Honor and Loyalty a Code to Live By!
What do the miners do when the canary dies? EVACUATE THE MINE not argue about the color of it's feathers or buy a parrot instead.
Where is my pitchfork and torch? I need them for a visit to the castle!