Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

On the Treadmill!

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

On the Treadmill!

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Fri 15 Apr 2011, 13:19:31

From an excellent thread over at TOD on how the Saudis HAVE NOT INCREASED PRODUCTION measurably to replace Libya's deficit. I suggest reading the whole thing..but this chart in the comments section from Lieten caught my eye.

I'd say its nothing short of "stunning".

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/7801#comment-793278
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby Daniel_Plainview » Fri 15 Apr 2011, 13:42:46

Yep, the Saudis are on a treadmill: they're spending increasing amounts just to stay at the same place.

Image

We're now entering our sixth year since they had their export peak and they just cut production 0.5 mb/d despite very, very high oil prices.
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 15 Apr 2011, 14:22:40

Daniel_Plainview wrote:Yep, the Saudis' are on a treadmill: they're spending increasing amounts just to stay at the same place.

Image


Wow! Someone put a treadmill on top of the plateau! Better look out below if the Saudis fall off.......

Image
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26627
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby Fishman » Fri 15 Apr 2011, 14:36:08

The parts I read didn't say the SA couldn't increase production, they were choosing NOT to increase production to rack up profits. They certainly have that option, but have generally not done this in the past since about the 70s when they saw restricting production led to such high prices that then led to global recession, and cut back in consumption. A double dip recession (highly probable now) and still high prices (say in gold, the dollar is now aproaching worthless) would be pretty clear evidence of peak oil.
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Fri 15 Apr 2011, 18:11:12

What Fishman is saying is essentially true. Saudi did increase their production in the first 2 months of 2011 by around 300 - 350 Kbopd. They said in the press they could make up any shortfalls from Libya but they did not say they intended to. The Saudis have been pretty adamant that the world is currently well supplied and I'm sure they feel quite comfortable taking a bit of OPEC production off the table to avoid a potential price collapse. Remember that you are not seeing strong draws on petroleum in the US which is still the largest consumer....current petroleum stocks are at the uppermost end of the average for this time of year.
I think it is important to understand that not everyone who likes to plot things up such as production etc. has the proper understanding of the business in order to have an informed opinion of whats going on. As an example I see on the Peakoil newspage a link to what I think is a Sandiford analysis of rigs in Saudi. He is suggesting rig rates never came up this year so it is hence obvious they can't meet the increased commitment. This is very faulty analysis as the rig work done to get to the 12 MM/d spare capacity was completed a year ago. There is no need to employ new rigs to access that production at this point in time.
So I suggest caution is needed when looking at all of these "remote" analyses.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby careinke » Fri 15 Apr 2011, 21:02:08

Fishman wrote:The parts I read didn't say the SA couldn't increase production, they were choosing NOT to increase production to rack up profits. They certainly have that option, but have generally not done this in the past since about the 70s when they saw restricting production led to such high prices that then led to global recession, and cut back in consumption. A double dip recession (highly probable now) and still high prices (say in gold, the dollar is now aproaching worthless) would be pretty clear evidence of peak oil.


While I agree with your assessment, another possibility is the House of Saud, (who are very pissed at the West for not backing Mubarak), may be flexing some economic muscle right now.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4696
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby Fishman » Fri 15 Apr 2011, 21:46:15

Agreed Careinke. If true they should bump up production shortly, reminding your friend who supplies the goodies is different from intentionally creating an international depression. Pstarr, if you are correct then Libya's lack of production should shortly destroy the bridge.
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby copious.abundance » Sat 16 Apr 2011, 00:35:53

Did anyone consider the possibility they just couldn't find buyers for any extra oil? Since the world market is well-supplied, why would anyone want to buy extra of something they've already got sufficient supplies of, whose price just suddenly jumped by some 15%?

You doomers spend so much time focusing on the supply side, you forget the demand side.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Sat 16 Apr 2011, 00:40:30

rockdoc,

I think somewhere over at TOD Stuart did note in updating his rig count that Saudis have ramped up rig count significantly in the last few months.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby copious.abundance » Sat 16 Apr 2011, 00:44:49

pstarr wrote:I tried to link to Stuart Stanifor chart at TheOildrum today (too may pixels). SA has not nearly compensated for offline Libyan crude. Libya production has fallen 1.2 mbpd, while SA has only increased by .2 mbpd ...

Yeah, but notice from the same article that *world* supply only fell by 0.5 mbpd in March - which means that non-Saudi/non-Libya producers bumped up supply by a half-million bpd. This would also help explain why KSA felt no compelling need to make up the full 1.2 million bpd loss of Libyan production. Others were already taking up some of the slack for them.

Also, people are quick to shout, "KSA didn't make up the full production loss!!" and get all excited, but I don't recall KSA ever saying their spare capacity could be switched on and delivered overnight. It takes time to turn on pumps, pump the oil into pipes, get it into storage tanks, make arrangements for tankers to arrive, wait for aforementioned tankers to arrive, and deliver said oil. It's not like you can do all that in a few days, or even a few weeks.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sat 16 Apr 2011, 00:49:06

careinke wrote:While I agree with your assessment, another possibility is the House of Saud, (who are very pissed at the West for not backing Mubarak), may be flexing some economic muscle right now.
I've been wondering about the House of Saud. Do they expect to be around for long? I think they must be stashing as much $ as possible offshore in case they need to make a fast exit with their heads still attached.

There is amazingly little speculation about how their regime might collapse or the consequences - seems to be in the "unthinkable" category.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sat 16 Apr 2011, 00:56:09

OilFinder2 wrote:Did anyone consider the possibility they just couldn't find buyers for any extra oil? Since the world market is well-supplied, why would anyone want to buy extra of something they've already got sufficient supplies of, whose price just suddenly jumped by some 15%?
Yeah, and if the price jumped by several hundred % (which it did over the last few years) they would have even less desire to buy. If the price gets high enough, nobody will want the stuff, so the market will be well supplied by teacups of oil.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 16 Apr 2011, 08:50:17

This thread should be merged with the speculators thread. There is obviously a connection here, namely, that supply shortage is not the main factor driving high prices lately.
mos6507
 

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Sat 16 Apr 2011, 10:42:30

rockdoc,

I think somewhere over at TOD Stuart did note in updating his rig count that Saudis have ramped up rig count significantly in the last few months.

I haven't been over there in the last couple of days. I caught Sandifords first post and then the more recent one about a drop in rig useage from the news page on PeakOil.
I think the important point here is that any relation of production rate to rig rate is nebulous. For exploration/development wells it takes months to years from the time a well is complete to when it can actually be turned on. As an example at Khurais they started the drilling campaign a year and a half in advance of bringing on first production. It takes that long to get all the wells drilled, completed tied-in and then all of the requisite facilites built. For completion wells they could be doing any sort of business including workovers totally unrelated to turning on additional production. The 300,000 bopd that the Saudis brought on as additional production was sitting there ready to go as spare capacity....i.e. it didn't need rig work.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: On the Treadmill!

Unread postby careinke » Sat 16 Apr 2011, 12:57:55

Keith_McClary wrote:
careinke wrote:While I agree with your assessment, another possibility is the House of Saud, (who are very pissed at the West for not backing Mubarak), may be flexing some economic muscle right now.
I've been wondering about the House of Saud. Do they expect to be around for long? I think they must be stashing as much $ as possible offshore in case they need to make a fast exit with their heads still attached.

There is amazingly little speculation about how their regime might collapse or the consequences - seems to be in the "unthinkable" category.


I've been predicting the fall of the House of Saud since the first time I went there in 1979. Now I think it will never happen. Those guys are masters at political maneuvering. This time they obviously paid off the religious police (Matawa), the Matawa started preaching against protesting since shortly before Mubarak's fall.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4696
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest


Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests