Link
Discusses how algorithms are now the information gatekeepers for us.
Nothing most wont have surmised but its a nice to bring into focus how the net is not news neutral.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
dbruning wrote:The media isn't about educating/informing anymore, it's about profit, swaying public opinion, and that horrible new click-bait crap is pure evil.
Hence the original saying of "trust, but verify" doesn't even work for me anymore, now it's "distrust, verify, and let them earn your confidence in them"....and the MSM regularly fails to earn that trust.
I consider this forum a decent place to learn...and ironically it's because we have so many posters constantly warring to promote their individual views. Because of that, people regularly cite where they are getting their information from, in fact sources being cited is pretty much demanded or you are dismissed...which makes it easier for me to follow up and decide for myself who and what I choose to believe.
I have met the Internet filter....and it is me.
DesuMaiden wrote:It is hard to find reliable information on the Internet because most of the information you see online is unreliable. As such, not many people on the Internet have the most accurate worldview. Like other people mentioned in this thread, it is best to avoid social media, like Facebook and Twitter, if you want to find reliable info. Another thing to consider is to rely more on books for deep, intellectual research, and just use the Internet as a starting point for research. Then use books from after that. Or use a combination of reliable websites to guide you to which reliable books you should be reading.
After spending nearly 14 years online, I've seen how popular bunk is online. Nonsense-riddden "documentaries" on subjects like the NWO (New World Order), Federal Reserve conspiracies, ChemTrails, and UFOs typically have a lot more views than factual documentaries. I believe this is the case because nonsense and hype sells better because it is easier to believe in than facts and evidence. This also reflects the general scientific illteracy of the public because if they were more scientifically literate, they wouldn't believe in so much nonsense.
Return to Open Topic Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests