Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Someone Disagrees with Hayek's Theories

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Someone Disagrees with Hayek's Theories

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 08:02:14

Keynes's theory was forged in the Great Depression of 1929-1932 - the biggest economic collapse of modern times.

As their economies contracted, governments responded to their mounting budget deficits by raising taxes and cutting spending.

The Great Depression bottomed out at the end of 1932, with British unemployment having reached 20%, American unemployment even higher.

Keynes wrote the General Theory in 1936 to explain why the recovery was so feeble.

His revolutionary proposition was that following a big shock - usually a collapse in investment - there were no automatic recovery forces in a market economy.

The economy would go on shrinking until it reached some sort of stability at a low level.

Keynes called this position "under-employment equilibrium".

The reason was that the level of activity - output and employment - depended on the level of aggregate demand or spending power.

If spending power shrank, output would shrink.

In this situation it was the government's job to increase its own spending to offset the decline in public spending - that is by running a deficit to whatever extent necessary.

To cut government spending was completely the wrong policy in a slump.

When an economy is booming, a hair shirt at the Treasury is the right policy, when it is stagnating it is the wrong policy.

Keynes's message was: you cannot cut your way out of a slump; you have to grow your way out.

Eighty years on we have still not fully learnt the lesson.

link
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby prajeshbhat » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 08:25:25

One thing to remember is that in 1940s oil was almost free and it was easy to increase the productivity of farms and factories exponentially. So yes, increasing the aggregate demand was the best thing to do. Don't know if it is applicable today.
prajeshbhat
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue 17 May 2011, 02:44:33

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 08:44:44

At least it's good that Cid_Yama has finally begun working his way towards the key issues of economics. Maybe he'll even get around to reading Keynes "The General Theory" or Hayeks "Prices and Productions", although I would not advise him to begin his education there. He should start with "What has government done to our money." and everything else by Rothbard. That is a good start for the lay person. Hazlitts "Economics In One Lesson" is good too. Don't skip Bastiat or Menger. Eventually work your way to Mises "Theory of Money And Banking". I can lend you my personal copy signed by Ron Paul, 2002! Cid_Yama, send me a personal message and I'll be happy to help you get started learning about economics.

Keynes is popular with politicians because he advocates increasing the size of government. His suggestions have brought us to where we are today. Here is a great truth pronounce by Keynes:

"If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with bank-notes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coal-mines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again (the right to do so being obtained, of course, by tendering for leases of the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is."


I'll leave it to you to draw your own conclusions regarding Keynes' intellect.

:lol:
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 08:57:41

Von Mises was an idiot too. Fool.

Those that profited on the previous boom do not care about the following long periods of stagnation. But they should, because the masses will burn you out of your mansions.

The object is a stable economy that provides enough at all times to keep them from doing so. If the economy stalls, you have to bring it back to life. It is an absolute necessity.

That was the whole purpose of the food stamp program. Not because you feel warm and fuzzy about the poor. But to keep them from breaking into your home and stealing your stuff, just to feed themselves and their family.

You see, they don't just lay down and die in the streets.

They grab torches and come after you.

They topple governments and replace them with ones that will nationalize everything you own. Forced massive redistribution is a bitch. Usually the property owner does not survive.
Last edited by Cid_Yama on Wed 03 Aug 2011, 09:15:16, edited 3 times in total.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby prajeshbhat » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 09:06:21

Keynes is popular with politicians because he advocates increasing the size of government. His suggestions have brought us to where we are today.


Nopes. Keynes suggestions pulled the western world out of the depression. What you had after the 1970s was not keynesian economics. It is neo-clasiccal economics of which Milton Friedman was the founding father. It was mostly union bashing and letting the "free market" (read big banks) decide lending practices.

Of course the last thing you need right now is the austrian school austerity nonsense. It's an all pain, no gain measure. People will react violently to imposed austerity. It was mostly promoted by hacks like Von Mises and Von Hayek. They imposed auterity on their Austrian citizens and which destroyed their economy, after which they safely fled to England and America to avoid the wrath of the austrian public. Of course the school of thought is still alive among the neo-classicals.
prajeshbhat
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue 17 May 2011, 02:44:33

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 09:08:08

Join the conversation VM, whadda ya say?
{Pops
vision-master
 

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby dissident » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 09:12:39

mattduke wrote:Keynes is popular with politicians because he advocates increasing the size of government. His suggestions have brought us to where we are today.


Really, no government actually implements his suggestion so why is he so popular. Where do you get the notion that government spending during recessions coupled with austerity during boom times is equivalent to big government? Also, what has economic depression policy got to do with actual Big Brother Government policy such as the "Patriot Act" and the Department of Homeland Security. Keynes was not advocating big government, but politicians who like to use him as a whipping boy are the ones who actually push the Big Brother agenda.

mattduke wrote: Here is a great truth pronounce by Keynes:

"If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with bank-notes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coal-mines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again (the right to do so being obtained, of course, by tendering for leases of the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is."


I'll leave it to you to draw your own conclusions regarding Keynes' intellect.

:lol:


What's funny the inability of some to understand this statement. His point, which is trivially obvious, is that there is no special human economic activity. Any activity that engages people and involves the circulation of money is economics. Recessions and depressions are spasms of existing economic structure and not intrinsic physical states of society. Instead of quaking in fear and promoting through inaction a spiral of poverty, the government (the same one that creates the framework for civilized economics in the first place -- see how long your utopia can run without the judiciary and police) can enable new economic activity. Make-work projects actually work (e.g. the highway network, hydroelectric dams).

Have you gotten your Bush W. trickle down tax cut windfall yet? Bush's cuts are 1 trillion dollars, similar to the size of the deficit by no coincidence, yet the middle class keeps disappearing. Shouldn't small government be a cure-all? Just give the corporations all the freedom they want (like they have none now) and they will keep on shipping middle class jobs to China. Funny how big bad elected government enacting policies for the benefit of the electorate is such a nightmare, but unaccountable big corporations are expressions of freedom. Utopian ideologues should buy a clue, corporations are another form of government. They won't tax you, they'll just make you a serf like in Appalachia.
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby prajeshbhat » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 09:29:07

His point, which is trivially obvious, is that there is no special human economic activity.


300 years ago that may not be true(farming is absolutely indispensable).
But it makes sense today. Why do people go to Vegas anyway. Gotta question the intellect. And what's the deal with Paris Hilton.
prajeshbhat
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue 17 May 2011, 02:44:33

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby Pops » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 10:02:57

Cid_Yama wrote:Von Mises was an idiot too. Fool.

Cid, I'm really tired of casual trash talk.

Time for a change of tone here at PO.com
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby careinke » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 11:53:14

Pops wrote:
Cid_Yama wrote:Von Mises was an idiot too. Fool.

Cid, I'm really tired of casual trash talk.

Time for a change of tone here at PO.com


I agree. It is a weak mind that thinks it can win a point by starting out with an insult.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4696
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 11:59:28

And here I thought they were just entertainers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTQnarzmTOc
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 12:12:36

I read some Mises the other day. It was impenetrable academic bitchiness and personal feuds which the passage of time rendered meaningless within a few years.

Hayek was a major economist and Nobel laureate. It's pretty astonishing considering that today people read his work while taking a break from digging that punji pit in their back yard.

Have you read Hayek's "Why I Am Not A Conservative?"
http://www.fahayek.org/index.php?option ... view&id=46
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby AdTheNad » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 14:36:57

careinke wrote:I agree. It is a weak mind that thinks it can win a point by starting out with an insult.

But it's ok to imply an insult in your second sentence? In that case guess what I think of you?

Really economics is pretty simple, it just tends to get hijacked by different political persuasions to prove whatever point they want to push. Like trying to find any kind of economic rational for the trickle down nonsense so thoroughly discredited. The problem is essentially with the goal. If you pretend you believe, and then manage to convince the masses, that the world becomes better when you increase GDP then you can pursue goals to maximise GDP. It is pretty obvious that those same goals help more and more wealth accumulate in fewer and fewer hands while being less than societally optimal.

I personally prefer goals aimed at maximising societal welfare, but that doesn't work quite so well for the sociopaths who currently own nearly all the wealth.
AdTheNad
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed 22 Dec 2010, 07:47:48

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 14:55:48

Maybe he wasn't so bad.........

When I say that the conservative lacks principles, I do not mean to suggest that he lacks moral conviction. The typical conservative is indeed usually a man of very strong moral convictions. What I mean is that he has no political principles which enable him to work with people whose moral values differ from his own for a political order in which both can obey their convictions. It is the recognition of such principles that permits the coexistence of different sets of values that makes it possible to build a peaceful society with a minimum of force. The acceptance of such principles means that we agree to tolerate much that we dislike. There are many values of the conservative which appeal to me more than those of the socialists; yet for a liberal the importance he personally attaches to specific goals is no sufficient justification for forcing others to serve them. I
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby careinke » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 15:52:49

AdTheNad wrote:
careinke wrote:I agree. It is a weak mind that thinks it can win a point by starting out with an insult.

But it's ok to imply an insult in your second sentence? In that case guess what I think of you?


Sorry you were not smart enough to catch the satire.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4696
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 19:22:32

prajeshbhat wrote:They imposed auterity on their Austrian citizens and which destroyed their economy, after which they safely fled to England and America to avoid the wrath of the austrian public. Of course the school of thought is still alive among the neo-classicals.

Ok, this is an outright lie. Mises left because of threats to his life by the nazi government due to his uncompromising pro-liberty stance. Subsequently they ransacked his apartment.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 19:24:51

PrestonSturges wrote:I read some Mises the other day. It was impenetrable academic bitchiness and personal feuds which the passage of time rendered meaningless within a few years.

Hayek was a major economist and Nobel laureate. It's pretty astonishing considering that today people read his work while taking a break from digging that punji pit in their back yard.

Have you read Hayek's "Why I Am Not A Conservative?"
http://www.fahayek.org/index.php?option ... view&id=46

Try reading Rothbard.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 19:27:03

dissident wrote:Recessions and depressions are spasms of existing economic structure and not intrinsic physical states of society.

Recessions and depression are the reorganization of capital required to correct the malinvestments and distortions caused by the preceding artificially-low interest rate fueled boom. The depression is the cure. The bankercrat boom is the disease.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby americandream » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 20:25:42

mattduke wrote:
dissident wrote:Recessions and depressions are spasms of existing economic structure and not intrinsic physical states of society.

Recessions and depression are the reorganization of capital required to correct the malinvestments and distortions caused by the preceding artificially-low interest rate fueled boom. The depression is the cure. The bankercrat boom is the disease.


Assuming one could remove banking from the flow cycle of capital, these boom/busts would still arise. As capital's velocity increases with the removal of barriers, speculation replaces investment and of course, increasingly precarious mechanism's for accumulation are resorted to in a bid to outwit competing speculation. I'ld go so far as to say that we ain't seen nothing yet. The next two decades will see a swift rise in reckless speculation of a sort that will even shock followers of these voodoo economists giving rise to the very rage that Marx deduced would precede the ultimate rejection of greed based civilisation..
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Hayek was a Moron

Unread postby prajeshbhat » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 21:23:42

Ok, this is an outright lie. Mises left because of threats to his life by the nazi government due to his uncompromising pro-liberty stance. Subsequently they ransacked his apartment.


Wow. If he was so uncompromising, why did he run away like a coward. Fleeing to a safe country when somebody breaks into your apartment doesn't sound very uncompromising to me. He should have stayed there and fought for his beloved free-market principals.

It may be worthwhile to recall why the nazis came into power the first place. That was the retaliation from the public after these austerity freaks subjected them to starvation. This is what the austerity ideologues don't get. By imposing austerity they are creating conditions for a communist revolution, the very thing they fear the most. They just assume that people will applaud them for the virtues of self-deprivation that they are promoting.
prajeshbhat
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue 17 May 2011, 02:44:33

Next

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests