EnergyUnlimited wrote:Novus wrote:Obama is a corporate Lap Dog pure and simple. He is 100% not a communist. Tax the poor to give to the rich. That is not Communism.
Ech, you are mistaken.
Look on NK:
tax starve the poor and
give feed the rich.
That is where socialism/communism leads:
High rank commies have food and others starve.
Communism is a sort of feudalism where there is a permanent system induced shortage of basic goods, regardless of ability to produce these.
Mob is starving or barely surviving and commies are getting fat.
So if a capitalist plutocrat is trying to impress woman, he will show a Lamborghini car, private jet, mansion and a luxury yacht.
On the other hand a Commie will show some scrap of pork (denied for mob) and a lipstick smuggled from rotten West.
If you had bothered to read Marx, you would understand why attempting to configure a socialised economy in an incompletely globalised capitalism is wasted effort. For one thing, the potential for corruption is very high, as it is with capitalist parliamentarism for example (read Lenin on the paradox of parliamentarianism's rise and the failure of the commons).
A theory, in other words, that delineates the eventual failure of capitalism and precisly why it will fail as well as all the risks that lie in between in the:
1 Removal of all barriers to capital:
2 The return to neo-feudalism in worker conditions:
3 The continued betrayal by a false intelligensia quickly absorbed by the capitalist ranks in failed attempts at premature socialisation within nation states:
4 The eventual domination of all thought by the capitalist in a manner not dissimilar to the kings of olde (the divine rights of kings?)
5 The complete elimination of the state as the mode for mediating the affairs of and services within geographic regions;
6 The emergence of a truly global capitalist class, at once, sharing common values and yet, in a constant state of competiton leading to the emergence of brute capitalism and high speculation;
7 The eventual emergence of a global labour awareness from the ashes of utter destitution as each generation is repeatedly betrayed by an inflammable mix of theocratics, nationalists, social democrats, fascists, nazis and other assorted fronts for continued accumulation by the elite.
These are historic givens just as the French Revolution and the toppling of the French nobility accompanied the emergence of bourgeoisie social economy worldwide and what we are witnessing is the natural flow of time and society. To this call a nationalist, a communist in the midst of this process, especially from one of the supporters of the architects of the emerging globalism, points to how deep is the indoctrination. To then argue that NK is an example of the elitism inherent in a theory on historic social-economy (it is just a theory, not some crazy nutjob conspiracy on how to become a billionaire by formenting a revolution for economic equality) also confirms how complete is the ignorance.
)
