[bluekachina]

This year’s extent of Arctic sea ice could be the second smallest ever, making the Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route ever more navigable. But in and around the Bering Strait, the amount of ice wouldn’t matter if the plans to build an underwater tunnel between Russia and Alaska are realized. Though the idea was initially floated by Tsar Nicholas II in 1905, it was scrapped by the Soviets and then again by the economic meltdown of the 1990s following the Soviet collapse. Vladimir Putin reignited Russian interest in the project and raised the issue with former president George W. Bush in 2008. Now, the Daily Mail reports that the Duma has just approved the plans to build the 64-mile tunnel and rail link, which could cost anywhere from $60-100 billion to construct. Reports are conflicting, but the tunnel will include a high-speed rail for cargo trains and possibly a road, fiber optic cable connections, and energy links. With the new 500-mile extension of the Trans-Siberian Railway from Tynda to Yakutsk scheduled to be completed in 2013, the tunnel could be more feasible this time around. It would link Yakutsk, in Siberia, with the west coast of Alaska. Russia is determined to add 2,360 miles to the TSR by 2030 as part of its strategic plan. This will help it export more of Siberia’s resources to places like China and North America.

Exporting energy to Canada and Alaska via rail might seem silly, given that both Alaska and Canada export much of the oil they produce. However, Alaska actually imports 43% of the petroleum products it uses [1]. Canada is a net exporter of oil, but the eastern provinces import oil from countries like the U.K. and Norway, since that is cheaper than building a pipeline from the west, where most of the country’s petroleum resources lie. As such, while delivering energy from Siberia to Alaska might make some sense, shipping it all the way to eastern Canada does not seem economical when it is already not cost-effective to transport it from western Canada. Regardless, some believe that the tunnel could eventually carry 3% of the world’s freight and generate $11.5 billion in annual revenue. At this rate, the tunnel could pay for itself within ten years.

link

[papa moose]

Now, the Daily Mail reports that the Duma has just approved the plans to build the 64-mile tunnel and rail link, which could cost anywhere from $60-100 billion to construct.

Are members of the Duma referred to as Doomers? Do they tend to have a Cornie point of view about BAU or are they generally aware of Olduvai theory? Do they tend toward the "community" solution or are setting up the own dumasteads?

sorry couldn't resist.

Back in the real world, the Duma "approving it" for what ever that's worth is a very vague statement, what about the US govt? all well and good the ruskies starting a tunnel at their end but its just a hole in the ground if the yanks don't approve it at the other end!

[papa moose]

But seriously Blue Kachina this was discussed in an earlier thread by Sixstrings about a week or two back, a few other links but all going back to the same original "source"

[Keith_McClary]

It could connect up with Alaska's "Bridge to Nowhere":

From Ketchikan looking south at a conceptional rendering of Gravina Island Bridge.
Front Page Photo Courtesy Gravina-Access Project

Last year Congress allocated $223 million dollars for this bridge from Ketchikan, Alaska, population 8,000, with Gravina Island, Alaska, population 50.

[Cid_Yama]

Gravina Island has the Airport and there are no roads that connect Ketchikan with anywhere.

Right now, if you are going anywhere you have to ferry to Gravina to catch a plane. Considering the latitude, you can understand why they might want a bridge.

There is also a passenger ship that goes to Washington State and a helicopter service to nowhere.

You also need to look at the population in context. Ketchikan is the 5th largest city in Alaska.