Loki wrote:How many advisors and contractors will remain?
Hey, Bush made the deal to leave. That's what ended the war.careinke wrote:I think we should give Obama ALL of the credit for this.
Keith_McClary wrote:Hey, Bush made the deal to leave. That's what ended the war.careinke wrote:I think we should give Obama ALL of the credit for this.
I've been following this for months, it's been ignored by the media, especially US.
careinke wrote:I think we should give Obama ALL of the credit for this. Maybe it will inspire him to do the same in Afghanistan.
careinke wrote:Loki wrote:How many advisors and contractors will remain?
Initial indications are NONE. Seems the Iraqi's would not grant a SOFA agreement. I'm sure there will be Marines at the embassy but for now that's about it.
The 2001 US-led invasion and subsequent fall of the Taliban opened up a goldmine for private security contractors, who won deals to guard embassies and NATO convoys, and offered logistical and consultancy services.
...
"Private security companies will be looking at moving their better personnel to a potentially more profitable theatre because of all the uncertainties here," said one adviser in the business.
Libya's oil wealth and the prospect of prolonged instability are likely to keep foreign security firms in business for some time.
"While the country (Libya) is in an unstable position, there's going to be plenty of work for companies like ours," said Johnson.
But the end of the war does not mean the end of the U.S. presence in Iraq. Indeed, speaking after the president’s brief announcement, Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough acknowledged that the United States would continue to train Iraq’s military in the new weaponry that Obama has agreed to sell the government that emerged after U.S. troops toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein in 2003. Just this year, the Pentagon approved a sale of F-16s to Iraq’s air force.
Also remaining in Iraq will be military contractors who currently protect American diplomatic missions in Iraq, such as the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and the consulate in Irbil.
“As part of a new agreement there will be Americans in Iraq training and assisting the Iraqi armed forces,” Qubad Talabani, the Kurdistan regional government representative in Washington and the son of Iraq’s president, told The Daily Beast. “These Americans will not be combat troops but they will be U.S. soldiers.”
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-declares-ir ... 00285.html
Plantagenet wrote:I don't mind giving Obama the credit---maybe he secretly wanted his own negotiations to stay in Iraq to fail and undercut his people somehow. And IMHO Obama also deserves some credit for toppling Khadaffi in Libya and Mubarek in Egypt.
Expatriot wrote:This is awful news.
It means that something major is going to happen before then.
I'm seeing conflicting reports on this:Loki wrote:Hmmmm.......
“As part of a new agreement there will be Americans in Iraq training and assisting the Iraqi armed forces,” Qubad Talabani, the Kurdistan regional government representative in Washington and the son of Iraq’s president, told The Daily Beast. “These Americans will not be combat troops but they will be U.S. soldiers.”
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-declares-ir ... 00285.html
Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta held out the possibility of keeping a small force of American military trainers in Iraq in the future, although there are no negotiations under way on numbers or a mission.
“We’re prepared to meet their training needs, we’re prepared to engage in exercises with them, we’re prepared to provide guidance and training with regard to their pilots, we’re prepared to continue to develop an ongoing relationship with them in the future,” Mr. Panetta told reporters on his plane on Friday en route to Indonesia.
On Friday evening, an American official in Iraq, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deliberations are confidential, said that negotiations would now center on arrangements that would begin next year, after all United States troops leave.
Possibilities being discussed are for some troops to return in 2012, an option preferred by some Iraqi politicians who want to claim credit for ending what many here still call an occupation, even though legally it ended years ago. Other scenarios being discussed include offering training in the United States, in a nearby country such as Kuwait, or having some troops here under NATO auspices.
evilgenius wrote:Yep, we'll be back as soon as the Shiites and the Sunnis find themselves unable to share the country.
gollum wrote:Americans are angry and fed up they won't allow any more military antics involving ground troops in the middle east.
gollum wrote:I don't think so, Americans are angry and fed up they won't allow any more military antics involving ground troops in the middle east.
Return to Open Topic Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests