A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.
Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Eisenhower's speech is not about a "they". Its about us, you, me, himself; our ownership of what we chose to create. "THEY" don't do anything without our desire and consent; they obey it with complete dispassion. The consequences are *our* responsibility.
AgentR11 wrote:What I dislike about the Eisenhower speech is that it has given an "out" to Americans, unintentional as that might have been. It is no longer *us* committing these various horrors, but some distant, abstract, un-person, that we name "military-industrial complex". We want oil, it gets us oil, and does horrible things in the process; we see the horrible thing, and we do not say, "I did that.", but rather, "they did that, and they should be held to account."
Resolve to yourselves, next time you turn the key to the ignition in your car or truck, "I did that.".
Own it.
Eisenhower's speech is not about a "they". Its about us, you, me, himself; our ownership of what we chose to create. "THEY" don't do anything without our desire and consent; they obey it with complete dispassion. The consequences are *our* responsibility.
JohnRM wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/21/us/texas- ... ?hpt=hp_c1
Take a good look. Shakira is a four year old little girl from Pakistan that suffered this damage to her face after a US drone strike. I am posting this, because when I first saw it, it crushed me. I plan to copy this and post it to every forum I use and to make hard copies to pass around in my area. I want everybody to see what we're doing to people over there. Americans are paying for it and they need to see what they're getting for their money. They need to have this image right in their face. I want it to haunt them in their sleep. This little girl isn't the only one. We've done this to millions, over the years. We the People are responsible for this.
Who is going to respond and justify this? Who is brave enough?
For the rest of you, why isn't this stuff front-page? Why are we not angry about this? Do we, as Americans, not care?
Pretorian wrote:John, you do realize that everything that you do brings suffering and death? Or no?
rangerone314 wrote:Pretorian wrote:John, you do realize that everything that you do brings suffering and death? Or no?
A bug died on my windshield today.
Pretorian wrote:rangerone314 wrote:Pretorian wrote:John, you do realize that everything that you do brings suffering and death? Or no?
A bug died on my windshield today.
Amongst many other things I'm sure, not counting those that WILL suffer and die as a result of that trip.
rangerone314 wrote:Similar to how Americans don't want to see animals slaughtered or do it themselves, but they have no problem reaping the rewards by going to a store to buy that meat under the cellophane.
I have 17 chickens... used to have 23.careinke wrote:rangerone314 wrote:Similar to how Americans don't want to see animals slaughtered or do it themselves, but they have no problem reaping the rewards by going to a store to buy that meat under the cellophane.
Meat comes from animals, I thought the grocery store made it?
I think everyone should kill their own meat at least once. It gives you respect for your food.
careinke wrote:rangerone314 wrote:Similar to how Americans don't want to see animals slaughtered or do it themselves, but they have no problem reaping the rewards by going to a store to buy that meat under the cellophane.
Meat comes from animals, I thought the grocery store made it?
I think everyone should kill their own meat at least once. It gives you respect for your food.
careinke wrote:rangerone314 wrote:Similar to how Americans don't want to see animals slaughtered or do it themselves, but they have no problem reaping the rewards by going to a store to buy that meat under the cellophane.
Meat comes from animals, I thought the grocery store made it?
I think everyone should kill their own meat at least once. It gives you respect for your food.
Newfie wrote:I make lots and lots of brownie points with my Lefty Loonie friends when I suggest that we require people to obtain a carnivore's license by slaughtering and dressing and then eating an animal. (They have taking to whispering behind my back that maybe I'm a conservative.)
Vegetarians are a bit more difficult argument.
Return to Geopolitics & Global Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests