Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Trillion Dollar Opportunities

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Trillion Dollar Opportunities

Unread postby Graeme » Wed 28 Dec 2011, 18:31:00

Trillion Dollar Opportunities

During the last decade, technologies have been developed and demonstrated at scale to economically produce natural gas from shale rock formations. As a result, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that the US has about 800 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable shale gas. Just ten years ago, this shale gas was considered uneconomic. At a forward price of $5 per thousand cubic feet, this gas now has a value of $4 trillion. This is a huge economic stimulus. Unlike government spending and/or tax cuts to stimulate economic growth, this opportunity will not increase deficits and national debt. Rather, it will result in over $1 trillion in new taxes paid to federal and state governments.
This single opportunity is not sufficient to jump-start the US economy. But there are many other similar opportunities with a total value over $40 trillion. Together, they could create millions of good jobs, stimulate sustainable economic growth, improve energy security, and enhance environmental protection. Some of the best opportunities are as follows:

Shale Oil

Enhanced Oil Recovery

Alaska Oil

Light Vehicle Efficiency

Offshore Oil and Gas

Oil Sands

Energy Independence


energypulse
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Trillion Dollar Opportunities

Unread postby kublikhan » Wed 28 Dec 2011, 18:55:56

Until the drillers realize they aren't making money at this game, then all of those trillions go poof.

The effort to secure leasing rights in Michigan was part of Chesapeake's national "land grab," a term the company has used in its filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. But Chesapeake's Michigan land rush quickly ended. In court this month, lawyers for land owners alleged that lease agreements were voided after Chesapeake learned a well it drilled in the state had come up dry.

Bonuses promised to land owners went unpaid, according to court documents submitted by lawyers for the land owners. Northern Michigan Exploration, the Chesapeake-affiliated shell company, rejected more than 97 percent of the leases its Michigan agents had signed with farmers and other land owners, the documents allege. More than 800 Michigan land owners - many of them elderly farmers - had their leases terminated by Northern, Reuters found.

Last year, Chesapeake was competing for land in Michigan with the Canadian driller EnCana. In May 2010, EnCana announced that it had already leased 250,000 acres in the state. As the frenzy intensified in June 2010, some Michigan bonuses rose to $3,000 an acre, up 200-fold from before the boom.

As Northern continued to reject leases, another company emerged in late October and went on a Michigan land-buying spree. The hundreds of rejected leases had depressed land prices from the summertime high, and a company called Crystal Lake Resources became one of the top buyers of public land at a state auction on October 26, 2010. According to records from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Crystal Lake bought drilling rights on 30,000 acres for $20.97 an acre. That's a 99 percent discount on the price promised to some land owners whose leases were canceled by Northern. In a response to one Michigan lawsuit, Crystal Lake Resources is identified as a lease buyer for Northern.
Special Report: Energy giant hid behind shells in "land grab"
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5023
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois

Re: Trillion Dollar Opportunities

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sun 01 Jan 2012, 17:06:31

So they used a shell company to bid up the prices then crash the market?

I guess we should be grateful we didn't have to give them a government bailout for their "losses."

This would seem to be illegal on so many levels, including the effect this had on share prices.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Trillion Dollar Opportunities

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Sun 01 Jan 2012, 22:37:24

I'm not sure what the problem is here? This is SOP in crown land sales in Alberta and British Colombia. Few companies want their competitors to know what their land holdings are so they pick the land up through "land companies". This has been the method by which land is acquired for as long as I can remember in Canada. What difference should it make to a landholder whether it is Cheseapeake or some other oil company leasing the land? The access and royalty fee is pretty much going rate now in most of these places and landholders have all sorts of resources to help them figure out what is fair and what is not. If you don't want to sell your rights, don't. You can't be forced. If you are interested in selling your rights there are groups that can help you out to make sure you get the going rate. Be aware, however, not all land is equal. If you happen to be sitting on the edge of a particular shale play then you will almost certainly get less for your lease. Having some knowledge about what you are sitting on is pretty paramount. Would you sell your car without seeing what the going rate is in the newspaper or on Blue Book?
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Trillion Dollar Opportunities

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 02 Jan 2012, 11:28:47

Lots of business practices that would be "racketeering" in the US are perfectly legal in Canada.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Trillion Dollar Opportunities

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Mon 02 Jan 2012, 15:01:40

Lots of business practices that would be "racketeering" in the US are perfectly legal in Canada.


care to give us an example? while you are at it, Mr lawyer please define "racketeering" (hint: look under RICO act) and how it applies to business practices in Canada.

Also you should be aware that the situation as described (land holding companies) is not illegal under US laws either.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Trillion Dollar Opportunities

Unread postby kublikhan » Tue 03 Jan 2012, 17:04:55

rockdoc123 wrote:I'm not sure what the problem is here? This is SOP in crown land sales in Alberta and British Colombia. Few companies want their competitors to know what their land holdings are so they pick the land up through "land companies". This has been the method by which land is acquired for as long as I can remember in Canada. What difference should it make to a landholder whether it is Cheseapeake or some other oil company leasing the land? The access and royalty fee is pretty much going rate now in most of these places and landholders have all sorts of resources to help them figure out what is fair and what is not. If you don't want to sell your rights, don't. You can't be forced. If you are interested in selling your rights there are groups that can help you out to make sure you get the going rate. Be aware, however, not all land is equal. If you happen to be sitting on the edge of a particular shale play then you will almost certainly get less for your lease. Having some knowledge about what you are sitting on is pretty paramount. Would you sell your car without seeing what the going rate is in the newspaper or on Blue Book?
That is not what the problem is. I have no issue with a company trying to keep down real estate costs by purchasing land rights through shell companies. Walt Disney did the same thing when they bought up land in Florida, to try and keep land prices from skyrocketing. The problem is Cheseapeake's shell companies are not honoring their contracts. After a Cheseapeake test well turned up dry, the shell company turned around and "cancelled" 97% of the leases. They list BS reasons for the cancellations the plaintiffs contend are manufactured whole cloth. Now Cheseapeake is trying to use the shell companies as a shield to distance itself from the legal ramifications of a breach of contract. Since the shell companies have no real assets, their is nothing to seize in court. So plaintiffs are trying to go after the parent company of the shells, Cheseapeake.
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5023
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois

Re: Trillion Dollar Opportunities

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Tue 03 Jan 2012, 17:52:57

That tactic might seem unethical to you but it is essentially the same way in which all larger companies work.
What is important here is whether or not the bonuses were agreed to be paid whether work was conducted or not. Most of the lease agreements I've seen in the US with freeholders require that work actually commences. The freeholder is protected inasmuch as if the work isn't started in a certain period of time he gets the land back. That is essentially what has happened here. The land holding company in question essentially relinquished their rights which of course revert to the landholder. The fact that later lease fees are lower is all part of nature of this business which is largely speculation of which lands are the most lucrative. Until a number of wells are drilled the risk is high but often too are expectations so you see bidding wars. If a poor well is drilled then expectations come back to normal. In Canada where most of the leases have been through a history of bids and ownership there are huge ranges in bonuses paid...an ever changing fact.
Note that the article itself indicates that Cheseapeak et al were working within the law.
The fact that Northern "rejected" leases rather than claiming chapter eleven suggests they felt they weren't doing anything illegal.
Without having seen the agreements that Northern signed with the freeholders it is difficult to say if there is a legitimate claim here or not, perhaps they did agree to a payment upon signing of the lease and not upon commencement of work.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Trillion Dollar Opportunities

Unread postby kublikhan » Wed 04 Jan 2012, 17:07:45

From what I gathered from the article, there were 2 separate payments the land owners were expecting:
1. A signing bonus for signing with Chesapeake instead of EnCana.
2. If successful wells are drilled, royalties.

Also affected was John O'Hair, a former judge and chief county prosecutor in Detroit. He leased his 140-acre family farm in Antrim County, Mich., to O.I.L. in a contract that offered an $84,000 signing bonus. If successful wells were drilled, the O'Hairs would receive 12.5 percent royalties.

The broker, David W. McGuire of O.I.L. Niagaran, voiced concern about Chesapeake's directives, court records indicate. He told McClendon that Chesapeake was asking O.I.L. to default on contracts that Chesapeake never intended to pay, according to the court records.

McGuire told McClendon that he had "never been put in a position like this," court records show. His comments were recounted in court this month by lawyers representing land owners.

By the time he arrived, Koonce says, Chesapeake's strategy was to abandon leases it had already signed. "Our instructions were to flunk the title if there was a word misspelled," Koonce says. He says he decided to speak publicly about the situation because he objected to the approach.

Chesapeake's main competitor in Michigan, EnCana, told Reuters that it honored the vast majority of leases it signed in the state and has faced no lawsuits that allege it reneged on any leases there. EnCana "very rarely" voids any lease it has signed, spokesman Alan Boras says.


Q. How much money can I expect if I sign an oil and gas lease?
A. The benefits to a landowner flowing from a lease primarily consist of three things. First, the lease may provide the landowner with the right to use a certain amount of free gas from the well for household use. This could easily add up to $2-3,000 each year and this could go on for decades. Second, the lessee is often willing to pay a signing bonus or delay rentals in return for your execution of the lease. These numbers are scattered all over the board and really depend on how “hot” your neighborhood is for oil and gas production and the current market price for oil and gas. Finally, if a well is drilled, you will also be receiving a royalty that is based upon the amount of oil and gas sold from the well – again, all over the board.
Frequently Asked Questions About Oil and Gas Leasing and Drilling

Since no wells were drilled, obviously they don't get the royalty check. But since they did infact sign with Chesapeake, it is my understanding they are still owed the signing bonus.

And the article said that Chesapeake doesn't think it violated the law. The pantiffs obviously do think they violated the law. If the signing bonuses were contingent upon wells being drilled, I don't think Chesapeake would be using such slimy tactics as rejecting leases for misspelled words.

Legal scholars say the operation serves as an intriguing test case of the use of shell companies. The tactics "raise moral and ethical questions about how entities can be used," says Joshua Fershee, a contract law professor at the University of North Dakota. "If Chesapeake knew from the start there was a good chance it would renege on leases and used (Northern) to avoid liability, that is improper," says North Dakota law professor Fershee.
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5023
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois


Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests