pstarr wrote:maybe they were raptured up?
Cog wrote:Sometimes we have to pretend for the woman's sake that certain things are a good idea.
vtsnowedin wrote:Cog wrote:Sometimes we have to pretend for the woman's sake that certain things are a good idea.
Her contributions to family income will more then cover it so why would I say no. I like sleeping indoors.
In addition, women may have a special role to play to promote sustainability. Women need to be prepped to find "ecological men" of limited resource consumption really, really sexy. Unfortunately, sexual selection has designed women to tend to prefer "alpha males" -- high status, high consumption, high resource control men (in ancestral times, they helped women's children survive and thrive). Men are adapted to do their best to give women what they want, or face reproductive oblivion. One way that today's men have demonstrated their high status has been to drive big sport utility vehicles (SUVs). However, what if women's psychological adaptations were manipulated (with collective consent) such that they found the guy behind the wheel of an electric car, electric scooter, or, better yet, a bicycle, irresistible? And, what if women sexually rejected the guy driving a big, gas-guzzling SUV?
BasilBoy wrote:In addition, women may have a special role to play to promote sustainability. Women need to be prepped to find "ecological men" of limited resource consumption really, really sexy. Unfortunately, sexual selection has designed women to tend to prefer "alpha males" -- high status, high consumption, high resource control men (in ancestral times, they helped women's children survive and thrive). Men are adapted to do their best to give women what they want, or face reproductive oblivion. One way that today's men have demonstrated their high status has been to drive big sport utility vehicles (SUVs). However, what if women's psychological adaptations were manipulated (with collective consent) such that they found the guy behind the wheel of an electric car, electric scooter, or, better yet, a bicycle, irresistible? And, what if women sexually rejected the guy driving a big, gas-guzzling SUV?
BasilBoy wrote:However, what if women's psychological adaptations were manipulated (with collective consent) such that they found the guy behind the wheel of an electric car, electric scooter, or, better yet, a bicycle, irresistible? And, what if women sexually rejected the guy driving a big, gas-guzzling SUV?
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... pse?page=3
vtsnowedin wrote:8) Wife dragged us out to eat at the local Applebee's last night (Friday). Parking lot was full , Had to wait twenty minutes for a table and the service was slow. Could have eaten at home for less then the tip. Their economy seems to be well stimulated.
Sixstrings wrote:BasilBoy wrote:However, what if women's psychological adaptations were manipulated (with collective consent) such that they found the guy behind the wheel of an electric car, electric scooter, or, better yet, a bicycle, irresistible? And, what if women sexually rejected the guy driving a big, gas-guzzling SUV?
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... pse?page=3
What a bunch of rubbish. How does this psychologist propose manipulating all women to find boring bicycle riding cheapskates attractive? And what does "collective consent" even mean. "Ok all you women, collectively consent to find me attractive."
Natural selection doesn't work that way, the psychologist is talking intelligent design (eugenics). It's not necessary. Natural selection has worked fine up until now, it's a machine leave it alone it all shakes out for the best. Besides, in a low-resource world, women would be even more attracted to high-resource males.
BasilBoy wrote:Natural selection will eventually weed out you and your kind...
Sixstrings wrote:BasilBoy wrote:However, what if women's psychological adaptations were manipulated (with collective consent) such that they found the guy behind the wheel of an electric car, electric scooter, or, better yet, a bicycle, irresistible? And, what if women sexually rejected the guy driving a big, gas-guzzling SUV?
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... pse?page=3
What a bunch of rubbish. How does this psychologist propose manipulating all women to find boring bicycle riding cheapskates attractive? And what does "collective consent" even mean. "Ok all you women, collectively consent to find me attractive."
Natural selection doesn't work that way, the psychologist is talking intelligent design (eugenics). It's not necessary. Natural selection has worked fine up until now, it's a machine leave it alone it all shakes out for the best. Besides, in a low-resource world, women would be even more attracted to high-resource males.
Return to Open Topic Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests