Cloud9 wrote:Ask the Russians how this will work out or the Brits or for that matter Alexander the Great.
There was not a large anti-war movement before the invasion of Iraq. It was mostly focused on Iraq, Afghanistan has multinational endorsement and the Germans and French are active and losing troops as well.Plantagenet wrote:Where are the anti-war marches?
Where are the any anti-war activists?
Where are the anti-war politicians?
Pops wrote:The only way to eliminate war is initiate the draft.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
For the British it was a buffer state between the likes of Russia, Persia and their Indian possessions, keeping other influences out, reduced the ability of them to interfere, especially in the volatile NW Frontier tribal areas.Revi wrote:There must be something that's worth a lot in that country for all those empires to want it so bad. Is it the minerals? Or the strategic advantage that is attained by controlling it?
dorlomin wrote:US women may stage hunger strike in Pakistan in anti-drones protest
Not all have abandoned the battle.
THE Afghan government could fall apart after NATO troops pull out in 2014, particularly if presidential elections that year are fraudulent, a report by the International Crisis Group says.
“There is a real risk that the regime in Kabul could collapse upon NATO's withdrawal,” said Candace Rondeaux, the ICG's senior Afghanistan analyst. “The window for remedial action is closing fast.”
The report - Afghanistan: The Long, Hard Road to the 2014 Transition - said the country was on course for another set of fraudulent elections after the chaotic presidential and parliamentary polls in 2009 and 2010.
A repeat could undermine what little hope remains for stability after the Afghan government takes full responsibility for security from US-led NATO forces, the report by the respected Brussels-based group said.
The coalition, which has waged an 11-year war against Taliban insurgents, is already drawing down its troops from a peak of some 130,000, and all combat forces are scheduled to quit the country by the end of 2014.
“The Afghan army and police are overwhelmed and underprepared for the transition,” said Ms Rondeaux. “Another botched election and resultant unrest would push them to breaking point.”
The Western-backed government of President Hamid Karzai and the parliament have failed to take any serious steps towards preparing for a clean vote, she said.
“Karzai seems more interested in perpetuating his own power by any means rather than ensuring credibility of the political system and long-term stability in the country.”
The president is constitutionally required to step down at the end of his second term in 2014, and has repeatedly said he will do so, but there are fears that he might try to manipulate the polls to ensure the election of an ally.
“The danger is President Karzai's top priority is maintaining control, either directly or via a trusted proxy,” Ms Rondeaux said.
“He and other leading members of the elite may be able to cobble together a broad temporary alliance, but political competition is likely to turn violent on the heels of NATO's withdrawal.”
The report said the possibility cannot be excluded that Karzai will declare a state of emergency as a means of extending his power, which would accelerate state collapse and likely precipitate a civil war.
“If that occurs, there would be few opportunities to reverse course in the near term. Securing the peace in Afghanistan would then remain at best a very distant hope,” Ms Rondeaux said.
AFP
Plantagenet wrote:The number of US military deaths in Afghanistan just topped 2000.
The war in Afghanistan continues, but doesn't seem to rate a mention anymore, even as the US casualties mount up.
Where are the anti-war marches?
Where are the any anti-war activists?
Where are the anti-war politicians?
Where is the media coverage of the the war?
Its like the war in Afghanistan has been "disappeared."
I guess the MSM and the anti-war activists and the anti-war democrats are all busy supporting Obama's 2012 re-election campaign, so any mention of the cost and the apparent failure of Obama's strategy in what he labelled his "good war" would be awkward just now.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests