"The German need to obtain Soviet oil was deemed the primary reason for the attack. Since the Soviet deliveries were insufficient to satisfy German needs for bringing the war [in the west] to a conclusion, the only recourse appeared to be the seizure and exploitation by the Germans of the oil resources of the Soviet Union." - Hans Kolbe, a U.S. spy
"The war was decided by engines and octane." – Joseph Stalin
"Above all, petrol governed every movement." – Winston Churchill
"We knew that our moves would be decided more by the petrol gauge than by tactical requirements." - Rommel
Link: Why Germany really lost World War II
Link: The Role of Synthetic Fuel In World War II Germany - implications for today?
Hitler had set out a return to the traditional German "drang nach osten" as a policy back when he was serving time writing Mien Kampf. German history is littered, from before the Teutonic Knights the Germans had seen a sort of 'manifest destiny' East. Oil played a limited role in the imagination of the Nazi regime, their execution of many war plans also display oil as a tag on not a driver. They were never more than 50% motorised in terms of land lift capacity. Heavily reliant on horse. They were extremely slow to recognise the importance of tanker tonnage in the battle of the Atlantic and instead focused on a tonnage war of all hulls. Their 'push' into North Africa was a rescue mission for the Italians that was never properly resourced and distant day dreams of the oil wells of Persia and Mosul were so far out of the question its insane.steam_cannon wrote:The video says "what if" but I don't think this is a "what if" as the German war machine was quite aware of oil's scarcity, at least in Germany. As it's been argued before that Germany's expansionism was driven greatly by their limited oil resources and definitely their excursions against the Soviets.
All true and also the US was a major world supplier of oil at the time, long before we hit the US peak in 1970-72 or so.sparky wrote:.
Certainly Oil was a strategic necessity
Hitler had Romanian supply some fields in Hungary , southern Poland and Alsace
( I'm not sure about the Netherlander as supplier )
they exploited the bituminous shale in Estonia and made intensive use of the Fischer–Tropsch process
The civilian population had to do with wood distillate stove mounted on the vehicle
it was deadly dangerous , grossly inefficient and slow to start
all the forest were being used up at a fast rate
Britain had an oil field , very secret , they trashed it to get as much oil as they could
it produced the equivalent of a dozen of tankers a year of very fine oil
There are thousands of videos based on this clip. Many funny videos and reaction videos. It is odd, but I say why not, they lost and it's great historical irony that instead of being feared, Hitler is just a joke in a video now.Lore wrote:There must have been several dozen parodies based on the same movie clip. There was a big stink about portraying living personages as Hitler...
steam_cannon wrote:...it's great historical irony that instead of being feared, Hitler is just a joke in a video now.
westexas wrote:FYI, I sent the link to JHK (who had not seen it).
I told Jim that he probably didn't know that Hitler was a fan. Jim said that, with Hitler as a fan, there goes his political career.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests