Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 05 Nov 2013, 18:56:28

Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

For years, the global oil majors have been like Formula One cars, racing flat-out to grow. Investors now want them to take their foot off the pedal.

Pressure has been building on them to curb their vast capital spending programmes and return more cash to shareholders. Those that do have seen their stock price rise.

Experts say the issue of capital discipline has become pivotal to any assessment of the sector. “The critical debate among equity investors is: what is the right balance these companies should be striking between retaining cash to reinvest in the business and distributing it to shareholders?” says Martijn Rats of Morgan Stanley.

For many, the right balance at a time of high industry costs and a stagnating oil price is to stop splurging on expensive projects and splurge instead on higher dividends and share buybacks.

The largest western oil companies, ExxonMobil, Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell, have so far resisted such reasoning. Simon Henry, Shell’s chief financial officer, said on a call to reporters last week that it would be “too easy to get cheap headlines and a cheap boost in the stock price just by cutting investment”. That was, he said, in “nobody’s long-term interest”.

But even the big three are now signalling that they expect their capital expenditure (capex) to level off in the next few years. And they are likely to come under continued pressure to bring it down.


FT
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby dolanbaker » Tue 05 Nov 2013, 19:21:00

When you've got your pedal to the metal and you can't go any faster, easing off now will cause a rapid reduction in speed! Then it will be twice as hard to recover that loss of momentum!
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.:Anonymous
Our whole economy is based on planned obsolescence.
Hungrymoggy "I am now predicting that Europe will NUKE ITSELF sometime in the first week of January"
User avatar
dolanbaker
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3855
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2010, 10:38:47
Location: Éire

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Tue 05 Nov 2013, 21:43:35

Actually a common problem the majors have been having for quite a while is the lack of drilling projects. For instance, ExxonMobil likes to brag about their ability to add as much or more reserves y-o-y as they produce. XOM's problem is that they are so large and produce so much they can't replace reserves with the drill bit. The year they bought XTO the reserves they picked up from that one acquisition represented over 80% of their reserve additions that year. As I've said before IMHO if prices had not boomed and the shales had not gotten red hot probably half the small public companies would be crippled if not completely gone. Folks buy Big Oil blue chips stocks because they have low volatility and predictable dividends. Little Oil is valued by Wall Street on their reserve growth y-o-y so they had to jump on the shale treadmill. Fall off that treadmill, reserves stop growing and stock prices fall.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby John_A » Tue 05 Nov 2013, 21:50:20

Anyone else remember what happened in 1986 after the heady days of high prices and assumptions of ever more needed oil......??

Back then it took like $10/oil...brought the industry low for a decade and a half....WTI is down to what, $94 today? Wonder what happens at $70? $50?

Encana Corp.’s new chief executive officer is shaking up the natural gas giant for the third time in as many years, surprising investors with a deeper-than-expected dividend cut and plans to create a new company expected to be a shareholder money-spinning machine.

Some four months after he took the helm, Doug Suttles is also cutting jobs and narrowing Encana’s focus to oil and natural gas liquids.


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-o ... e15261101/
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 05 Nov 2013, 22:01:28

Far from curbing spending, Chevron just announced a large INCREASE to their spending on exploration and production.

Chevron INCREASES spending on E & P

Image
Chevron steps up drilling in 2014
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26627
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 05 Nov 2013, 23:22:17

According to the IEA’s 2011 WEO report [16], almost $20 trillion must be invested in oil and gas energy supply infrastructure between 2011 and 2035 to ensure supply. That is approaching $1 trillion per year (see "propaganda campaign" thread).
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Tue 05 Nov 2013, 23:41:23

Little Oil is valued by Wall Street on their reserve growth y-o-y so they had to jump on the shale treadmill. Fall off that treadmill, reserves stop growing and stock prices fall.

It is only one valuation measure and by no means the most important. Return on capital invested, Cashflow per share, Recycle ratio, NAV , NPV/share are all used more often by the analysts in ranking stocks. They are not so much to do with what you have in the ground but how you are returning value to the investor from those reserves/resources.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby godq3 » Wed 06 Nov 2013, 18:41:19

Image
User avatar
godq3
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Tricity, PL

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby Subjectivist » Wed 06 Nov 2013, 19:27:31

If the majors stop investing in infrastructure and reserve replacement things are going to get ugly. This seems like a really bad plan to my eyes but I am no expert.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4701
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 09:57:05

Sub – “If the majors stop investing in infrastructure and reserve replacement things are going to get ugly” You mean it might not stay ‘pretty’ like it is now with $100 oil? LOL. Big Oil has a very serious problem most don’t think of as a problem: huge incomes. Think of a bank with $10 billion of deposits but isn’t making loans. What does management do to justify their paychecks…buy T-bills? Not hardly. Same thing with ExxonMobil and Chevron: do they start making huge dividend payments until they use up their surplus all the while seeing their income decline due to a lack of drilling? There is a good reason why you don’t see Big Oil spending a great deal of capex drilling relatively inexpensive onshore wells: they don’t have enough manpower to drill enough of them to exploit a significant amount of their income. They disparately need those $500+ million Deep Water and foreign projects to invest in. And even that’s not enough so they go after large acquisitions. As I mentioned earlier the XTO acquisition by ExxonMobil represented 80%+ of their reserve growth that year. IOW all the monies spent by them that year all around the world added less than 20% of their new reserves.

And it isn’t just Big Oil facing such pressures. How many here have heard of Linn Energy and Berry Petroleum? I doubt many if any have. But Linn is in the process of buying Berry for $4.9 BILLION (including taking over their debt). Long ago I read a report that highlighted the fact that the times (going back more than 70 years) of highest reserve growth for ExxonMobil weren’t during high price periods but during busts when they acquired companies on the cheap due to collapsing oil/NG prices. I have no doubt Big Oil has run the numbers on all the large independent oils and is waiting for a price drop to make them viable acquisition targets. Consolidation has always been a big factor in the oil patch even with the service companies. Year after year Halliburton acquires other service companies. I have a biz card sitting in front of me right now from a hand with Boots and Coots, the blowout fighting specialists. The card doesn’t say Halliburton but his email is halliburton.com. I have many other similar cards from companies that few in the public would understand where Halliburton operations because they don’t carry that name.

In that way my privately owned company has a great advantage: we only spend monies that deliver an acceptable rate of return. I don’t have to worry about shareholder concerns, Wall Street or reserve additions. I either make my owner a nice profit or he runs my butt off. A very simple relationship. LOL.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby Graeme » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 18:21:13

Here's more evidence of M and A.

BHP Billiton’s Former Oil Chief Yeager Expects More U.S. M&A

BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP)’s former oil and gas head J. Michael Yeager expects more industry mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. as onshore developers seek to sell assets they can’t develop and boost their technical skills.

“There’s a lot of churn that’s going to go on and you will continue to see a lot of transactional work,” Yeager, now chief executive officer of Maverick Drilling & Exploration Ltd. (MAD), said today in a phone interview from Houston. “Over time we hope to prepare ourselves to be part of that.”

Investor unrest over lackluster returns has prompted Occidental Petroleum Corp., Hess Corp., Apache Corp. and other energy companies to pursue breakup plans and global asset sales. Yeager, who led BHP’s $20 billion move into the U.S. shale gas industry before leaving the Melbourne-based company earlier this year, is focusing on oil in his new role at Maverick, an explorer developing fields south of Houston.

“When you take these large amounts of acreage, you have to drill it up, or you have to give it up,” Yeager said. “In some cases you may have three years to drill as much as you can and you lose the rest of it, so there’s acreage that people cannot handle on the market. There’s a lot of opportunity.”


bloomberg
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby John_A » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 18:32:36

Subjectivist wrote:If the majors stop investing in infrastructure and reserve replacement things are going to get ugly. This seems like a really bad plan to my eyes but I am no expert.


people invest less because they can't make as much. Like when they expect the price of oil to continue to decrease because the Iranian/Libyan premium is unwound from the market. No ugly involved....unless it becomes a runaway like it did in 1986 and had oil field folks working in grocery stores. Ask Rock.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101176443

All the oversupply? Hard to imagine this deep into our peak oil world, but true believers are not to be deterred.

http://www.investing.com/news/commoditi ... cus-254751

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... 0219116334

Strengthening US currency doesn't help.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStor ... g-20808280

Bad news for the industry maybe, but for consumers? Could be happy-happy joy-joy! Bring back MONSTER TRUCKS!! Yee-Hah!
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby Tanada » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 18:57:04

ROCKMAN wrote:It isn’t just Big Oil facing such pressures. How many here have heard of Linn Energy and Berry Petroleum? I doubt many if any have. But Linn is in the process of buying Berry for $4.9 BILLION (including taking over their debt). Long ago I read a report that highlighted the fact that the times (going back more than 70 years) of highest reserve growth for ExxonMobil weren’t during high price periods but during busts when they acquired companies on the cheap due to collapsing oil/NG prices. I have no doubt Big Oil has run the numbers on all the large independent oils and is waiting for a price drop to make them viable acquisition targets. Consolidation has always been a big factor in the oil patch even with the service companies. Year after year Halliburton acquires other service companies. I have a biz card sitting in front of me right now from a hand with Boots and Coots, the blowout fighting specialists. The card doesn’t say Halliburton but his email is halliburton.com. I have many other similar cards from companies that few in the public would understand where Halliburton operations because they don’t carry that name.


But how well can the oil majors gobble up the smaller companies when the prices are staying persistently high and thus the minors are making good profits? I believe you when you say that gobbling up the minors has been a winning strategy for a decade or two, but that was whenever there was a crash in price and the minors were facing bankruptcy or were actually bankrupt.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17059
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Oil majors under pressure to curb spending

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 20:42:03

T - M&A isn't so much driven by profits or the lack there of. It's driven by stock price expectations...or lack of price expectations. If the major shareholders (often the big fund companies) think there's minimal expectation of stock value increasing they'll be very receptive to a buy out offer especially if they are offered a bit of a premium over the current price. And often the offer is a combination of cash, debt assumption and stock in the acquiring company. Many acquisitions are of companies that actually appear rather viable. Typically a matter of it being an offer that can't be refused.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS


Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests