Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Risk of massive asteroid strike underestimated

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Risk of massive asteroid strike underestimated

Unread postby Graeme » Wed 06 Nov 2013, 17:31:39

Risk of massive asteroid strike underestimated

The asteroid that exploded on 15 February this year near the city of Chelyabinsk in the Urals region of Russia was the largest to crash to Earth since 1908, when an object hit Tunguska in Siberia. Using video recordings of the event, scientists have now reconstructed the asteroid's properties and its trajectory through Earth’s atmosphere. The risk of similar objects hitting our planet may be ten times larger than previously thought, they now warn.

The fireball’s early-morning flight through the sky over the Urals was observed by many people and captured by numerous video cameras. To observers on the ground, it shone 30 times brighter than the Sun, and had an energy equivalent to more than 500 kilotons of TNT. An analysis of calibrated observations now provides a precise picture of the asteroid’s last ride and reveals surprising details of its likely cosmic origin.



Of the millions of estimated near-Earth asteroids 10–20 metres in diameter, only about 500 have been catalogued. Models suggest that an object the size of the Chelyabinsk asteroid hits Earth once every 150 years on average, Brown says. But the number of observed impacts exceeding 1 kiloton of TNT over the past 20 years alone hints at an actual impact risk that may be an order of magnitude larger than previously assumed, Brown and his co-workers show in their study3. Scanning the visible sky with a view to identifying approaching small objects might be a prudent response, he suggests. One such asteroid detection and early-warning system, ATLAS, is being established in Hawaii.


nature
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Risk of massive asteroid strike underestimated

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 01:43:15

Bad Astronomy comments:
Finally, using the energy of the blast, together with data from other atmospheric impacts (from satellite and infrasound data), they compared the number of impacts we’ve seen in the past two decades from what is estimated using telescopic surveys and by counting lunar craters. Weirdly, they found that the rate of impacts from objects between 10 and 50 meters in diameter over the past 20 years is several times higher than previously estimated. According to their work, statistically speaking, we should expect a Chelyabinsk-sized impactor every 25 years or so.

That surprised me. The scientists who ran the study say this rate is much higher than you’d expect if we were hit by a steady rate of rocks over geologic times. It’s possible we’re in a period of unusually common impacts, although they don’t offer an explanation as to why this might be (they are just reporting it apparently exists). It could be that some largish asteroid in space got hit and broke up some time long ago, increasing the number of rocks crossing our orbit. It could simply be coincidence, and we’re just randomly getting more impacts recently.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests