Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Gordianus » Fri 06 Dec 2013, 05:41:30

A few centuries ago, there were just a few widely used materials: wood, brick, iron, copper, gold, and silver. Today’s material diversity is astounding. A chip in your smartphone, for instance, contains 60 different elements. Our lives are so dependent on these materials that a scarcity of a handful of elements could send us back in time by decades.

If we do ever face such scarcity, what can be done? Not a lot, according to a paper published in PNAS. Thomas Graedel of Yale University and his colleagues decided to investigate the materials we rely on. They chose to restrict the analysis to metals and metalloids, which could face more critical constraints because many of them are relatively rare.

The authors’ first task was to make a comprehensive list of uses for these 62 elements, which was surprisingly difficult. Much of the modern use of metals happens behind closed doors in corporations under the veil of trade secrets. Even if we can find out how certain metals are used, it may not always be possible to determine the proportions they are used in. The researchers' compromise was to account for the use of 80 percent of the material that is made available each year through extraction and recycling.

The next task was to determine if there were any substitutes for these uses. But as Graedel writes, “the best substitute for a metal in a particular use is not always readily apparent.” Elemental properties are quite unique, and substitution will often reduce the performance of the product. But it can be done.

Two examples stand as a testament to that fact. In the 1970s, cobalt was commonly used in magnets. When a civil war in Zaire caused a scarcity of cobalt, scientists at General Motors and elsewhere were forced to develop magnets that didn't use it. More recently, a shortage of rhenium, which is used in superalloys for gas turbines, forced General Electric to develop alternatives that use little or no rhenium.

Graedel’s analysis of substitutes involved ploughing through scientific literature and interviewing product designers and material scientists. The results are a sobering reminder of how critical some metals are. On seeing the data, Andrea Sella of University College London said, “This is an important wake-up call.”

None of the 62 elements have substitutes that perform equally well, and 12 out of the 62 have no substitutes at all (or if there are substitutes, they are inadequate). These 12 elements are rhenium, rhodium, lanthanum, europium, dysprosium, thulium, ytterbium, yttrium, strontium, thallium, magnesium, and manganese.

Economists have long assumed that a shortage of anything will promptly lead to the development of suitable substitutes, an attitude fostered in part because there have been successful substitutions in the past, such as in the cobalt and rhenium examples. But metals are special, Graedel said: “We have shown that metal substitution is very problematic. Substitution would need to mimic these special properties—a real challenge in many applications.”

“The clarity of Graedel’s thinking is impressive,” said Sella. “No one has analyzed metal criticality in such detail.” One of Graedel’s biggest contributions has been developing a visual way of understanding how critical metals are. The researchers created a 3D map, where the three axes represent supply risk, environmental implications, and vulnerability to supply restrictions.

The scarcity of metals came to public attention in 2010 when China suddenly decided to restrict its export of a group of metals called the rare earths. Prices of these metals shot up by as much as five times and caused companies around the world to consider reopening their rare earth mines. This situation had knock-on effects on the prices of everything from gadgets to wind turbines.

Some comfort may be drawn from the fact that consumptions of some metals can peak. For example, the use of iron has reached saturation in many countries, and in the US, this seems to have happened for aluminum, too. This saturation is the case only for bulk metals, however. Scarcer metals, even with superior recycling, may never reach saturation.

Apart from China, a handful of countries, including the US, South Africa, Australia, Congo, and Canada, hold the most diverse and largest metal reserves. “A national disaster or extended political turmoil in any of them would significantly ripple throughout the material world in which we live,” said Graedel.

This measured analysis, published in PNAS, is a warning of a serious issue. “But Graedel has a thoughtful way of putting it,” said Sella.


The Conversation
Gordianus
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon 14 Oct 2013, 14:22:19

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Narz » Fri 06 Dec 2013, 06:58:10

Good thing SmartPhones aren't a necessity.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 06 Dec 2013, 07:43:47

Gives pause to ponder supposed resilience.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Beery1 » Fri 06 Dec 2013, 07:44:04

"Our lives are so dependent on these materials that a scarcity of a handful of elements could send us back in time by decades."

Decades? The horror! We might have to live in a world with no computers, flat panel TVs, cell phones, DVDs, credit cards, barcode scanners and segways!

Oh, the humanity!

It would be a nightmarish living hell, and the survivors might envy the dead, but I think a handful of us might survive.
"I'm gonna have to ask you boys to stop raping our doctor."
Beery1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Tue 17 Jan 2012, 21:31:15

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Tanada » Fri 06 Dec 2013, 08:31:50

It is way past time to start mining our accumulated wastes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis ... ous_metals

Ruthenium, rhodium

Ruthenium and rhodium are precious metals produced by nuclear fission, as a small percentage of the fission products. The radioisotopes of these elements generated by nuclear fission with the longest half-lives have half-lives of 373.59 days and 45 days for ruthenium and rhodium, respectively. This makes their extraction from spent nuclear fuel possible, although they must be checked for radioactivity before use.[1]
The radioactivity in MBq per gram of each of the platinum group metals which are formed by the fission of uranium. Of the metals shown, ruthenium is the most radioactive. Palladium has an almost constant activity due to the very long lived 107Pd while rhodium is the least radioactive

Until now no facility has been reprocessing spent nuclear fuels for ruthenium and rhodium; however, Japan is planning to do so in their new spent fuel reprocessing facility, which will help offset the cost of reprocessing.
Ruthenium

Each kilogram of the fission products of 235U will contain 63.44 grams of ruthenium isotopes with halflives longer than a day. Since a typical used nuclear fuel contains about 3% fission products, one ton of used fuel will contain about 1.9 kg of ruthenium. The 103Ru and 106Ru will render the fission ruthenium very radioactive. If the fission occurs in an instant then the ruthenium thus formed will have an activity due to 103Ru of 109 TBq g−1 and 106Ru of 1.52 TBq g−1. 103Ru has a half-life of about 39 days meaning that within 390 days it will have effectively decayed to the only stable isotope of rhodium, 103Rh, well before any reprocessing is likely to occur. 106Ru has a half-life of about 373 days, meaning that if the fuel is left to cool for 5 years before reprocessing only about 3% of the original quantity will remain; the rest will have decayed.[1]
Rhodium

It is also possible to extract rhodium from used nuclear fuel, which contains rhodium—1 kg of the fission products of 235U contains 13.3 grams of 103Rh. Therefore, as typical used fuel is 3% fission products by weight, it will contain about 400 grams of rhodium per ton of used fuel. The longest lived radioisotope of rhodium is 102mRh, which has a half-life of 2.9 years, while the ground state (102Rh) has a half-life of 207 days.[1]

Each kilogram of fission rhodium will contain 6.62 ng of 102Rh and 3.68 ng of 102mRh. As 102Rh decays by beta decay to either 102Ru (80%) (some Positron emission will occur) or 102Pd (20%) (some gamma ray photons with about 500 keV are generated) and the excited state decays by beta decay (electron capture) to 102Ru (some gamma ray photons with about 1 MeV are generated). If the fission occurs in an instant then 13.3 grams of rhodium will contain 67.1 MBq (1.81 mCi) of 102Rh and 10.8 MBq (291 μCi) of 102mRh. As it is normal to allow used nuclear fuel to stand for about five years before reprocessing, much of this activity will decay away leaving 4.7 MBq of 102Rh and 5.0 MBq of 102mRh. If the rhodium metal was then left for 20 years after fission then the 13.3 grams of rhodium metal would contain 1.3 kBq of 102Rh and 500 kBq of 102mRh. At first glance the rhodium might be adding to the resource value of reprocessed fission waste, as rhodium has the highest price of any precious metal ($97,000/kg in early 2010), but the cost of the separation of the rhodium from the other metals needs to be considered.[1]

Image

Pay particular attention to the solid bar for each element, that is the yield on the fission waste currently stored in the USA and other countries. In North America little reprocessing has been down so the average age of the waste is over 10 years. Then compare the list of recoverable elements with the 12 precious metals list in the first post.
None of the 62 elements have substitutes that perform equally well, and 12 out of the 62 have no substitutes at all (or if there are substitutes, they are inadequate). These 12 elements are rhenium, rhodium, lanthanum, europium, dysprosium, thulium, ytterbium, yttrium, strontium, thallium, magnesium, and manganese.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17059
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby rollin » Fri 06 Dec 2013, 18:58:19

It seems I never owned a smartphone, didn't end my life. My dumbphone works just fine.

Metals, like all elements are not destroyed. They may be alloyed but are recoverable, so any lost to society after mining is society's fault.

Manganese is the 12th most abundant element in the earth's crust. New methods have been developed to mine and purify low concentration manganese using low energy and low toxicity methods.

As far as rare earth metals Sweden and Greenland are prime areas for mining.

http://www.tasmanmetals.com/s/Norra-Karr.asp
http://www.ggg.gl/rare-earth-elements/r ... vanefjeld/

And who knows what minerals will be found as the Greenland ice sheet retreats.

There is also a heavy emphasis on BAU in future needs projections. With advances in molecular biology and genetics, civilization may veer away from an electrical/oxidation/mechanistic society and toward a biological/genitic based system. Today's demands may just fade away in the next few generations and what seemed like a shortage will become an over-abundance as demand for those materials fades away.
Also new structural forms of common materials and organics may replace today's rare element based systems.
Once in a while the peasants do win. Of course then they just go and find new rulers, you think they would learn.
rollin
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Thu 06 Dec 2012, 18:28:24

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Surf » Sat 07 Dec 2013, 01:14:22

Only two elements on that list, Rhenium and Rhodium are rare. They are mainly used in special metal alloys and as catalysts. You will not find these in your smart phone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhenium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodium

Rhenium is mainly used in jet engines. You can use other metal in jet engines. Using other metals can reduce performance somewhat. So in truth there are substitutes for it. Rhodium is mainly used as a catalysts to reduce emissions in cars. battery powered cars don't need it (electric cars have no emissions). Natural gas power plants don't sue catalysts to reduce emissions, instead ammonia is used. Also there is a lot of work going on to develop better catalysts. in the future it may not be needed.

Rare earths are mainly used in magnets, phosphors, and lasers. The only part of a smart phone that uses them is the magnet in the speaker. conventional iron magnets would work well enough for smart phones. Also rare earths are not rare. They are actually very common in soil and many other element can be used to make magnets, phosphors and lasers.

The scarcity of metals came to public attention in 2010 when China suddenly decided to restrict its export of a group of metals called the rare earths. Prices of these metals shot up by as much as five times and caused companies around the world to consider reopening their rare earth mines. This had knock-on effects on the prices of everything from gadgets to wind turbines.
.

The issue surrounding rare earths is more political than real. China created a rare earth monopoly and managed to shut down most rare earth mines in the rest of the world. Now that they have stopped exporting long closed rare earth mines around the world are reopening, includings some in north america and Europe.

China's latest attempt to create a monopoly, in the solar industry, has not gone well. Note only has china managed to put solar companies in north america and europe in bankruptcy, they sent many chinese companies into bankruptcy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_earth_element

strontium and magnesium are very common. Any disruption in supply for these elements would probably be caused by problems with the factory or transporting the material or political issues. Shortages do to lake of ore is hard to fathom. These elements are used frequently in alloys and and various chemicals. Magnesium may be used to make the case of the smart phone, or a manufacture may decide to use aluminum or plastic insead.

Thallium does have many uses. In many electrical devices it is used in thallium capacitors. Thallium capacitors have some unique features that make them useful but there are many ways to make capacitors that will perform as well or better than thallium. Additionally like most materials mentioned in this article, thallium is not rare.

But, as Graedel writes, “the best substitute for a metal in a particular use is not always readily apparent.” Elemental properties are quite unique and substitution will often reduce the performance of the product. But it can be done.
.

Each element has unique properties so you cannot simply replace one element with another. However it you change the way you do things you will often find substitute method that will have similar or better performance. For example take wind turbines. Due to reliability issues with gear boxes many manufactures switched to low RPM (revolutions per minute) permanent magnet generators. Rare earth magnets in these generators eliminated the need for gear boxes, reduce the weight, are efficient but cost more. However one manufacture, Enercon, decided to use a low RPM induction generator. Induction generators use electricity to create the needed magnetic field. Enercon generators are a little lower cost, are about 2% less efficient, a little heavier, and cheaper. Which is the better choice, permanent magnet generators, or induction generators? Many in the industry are debating that but there is no clear answer.

The author of this article is implying that any substitute would have a clear performance deficit that would make the alternative useless or undesirable. but in my experience the the performance difference is often small making the best solution debateable. Is a magnesium case for a smart phone better than one made from aluminum or plastic? Most customers don't buy a phone because it has a magnesium case and uses thallium capacitors. They buy the phone based on what they want to do with it, functionality, and cost.
Surf
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat 13 Jul 2013, 14:13:49

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Scrub Puller » Sat 07 Dec 2013, 05:29:59

Yair . . . Just back from a forced fortnight in "civilisation".

Judging by all the zombies walking around griffling on phones or with wires hanging out of their ears the sooner they run out of metals the better . . . shut all the bloody phones down and we might get a bit of work done.

The bloody things are an unnecessary time wasting blight on humanity and most people would be better off without them.

Cheers.
Scrub Puller
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013, 13:20:59

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 07 Dec 2013, 17:06:48

No signal out there hey Scrubbie? :P
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Scrub Puller » Sat 07 Dec 2013, 22:31:55

Yair . . . SeaGypsy. Got signal mate . . . I use it for this internet connection. (he grins)

I just think it's gone overboard with this phone B/S.

Everywhere I look people are fixated on bloody screens . . . hire an excavator to do some work and the operator starts of taking calls, not at $150 an hour plus cartage on my job he's not.

He was very pissed off when I told him to the bloody thing in his truck. You watch on any building site, tradesmen taking calls are costing some one.

I have a mate who's a builder/developer . . . he has a big sign informing subbys they can have their mobile phone on site or work for him, they can't do both.

Cheers.
Scrub Puller
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013, 13:20:59

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 08 Dec 2013, 02:12:00

Lolz :-D Done a fair bit of contracting in construction recent times- managers who 20 years ago would have been hands on and the main producer on the job- now spend about half the time on the phone- sorting out issues from the last job (not done properly by the apprentice and labor)- or chasing the next one. Same with mechanics, cleaners etc. Another thing I have come across is people in desk jobs who will only work for companies which allow them multiple tabs and don't have facebook bans. Recently I spent a couple of years tutoring at Uni in Melbourne- virtually every student in every class would have facebook open before anything else. Bans couldn't be implemented as some clever dick in the Uni bureaucracy had decided that facebook 'Is an important social media for promotion of the University'- they couldn't have their own page, encourage student groups to form etc- whilst banning it.

I would bet the real lost productivity due to facebook alone would be multiple $Trillions. On the other hand- I guess it goes to show what bull a lot of jobs and courses really are these days.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Scrub Puller » Sun 08 Dec 2013, 05:13:53

Yair . . . SeaGypsy. I'm surprised to find someone here who thinks a bit like me. By the way I like your down to earth style of writing, the main reason I come come here though is to follow ROCKMAN'S posts.

It is beyond me to keep my lip zipped and I slip in a comment occasionally to stir the pot a little, some of the commenters here get right up my nose.

Cheers.
Scrub Puller
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013, 13:20:59

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 08 Dec 2013, 06:29:32

Having spent about half my 46 years in remote parts of Australia might have something to do with that Scrubby :)
If people here get up your nose these days, you missed some doozies a few years back- the "Peak Oil Leads to Overnight Zombie Apocalypse, Race War, Class War and The End Of The World As We Know it!" phase...
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Tanada » Sun 08 Dec 2013, 08:14:54

SeaGypsy wrote:Having spent about half my 46 years in remote parts of Australia might have something to do with that Scrubby :)
If people here get up your nose these days, you missed some doozies a few years back- the "Peak Oil Leads to Overnight Zombie Apocalypse, Race War, Class War and The End Of The World As We Know it!" phase...


No Zombie Apocalypse? What do you call all those shuffling souls who can only focus on a tiny electronic screen wandering in and out of traffic?

Oh and the world of cheap oil we knew in 2005 did end, but as most people have been converted into BORG MATRIX electronic zombies including the Media nobody talks about it much.

For class warfare read anything posted by americandream, to get the race warfare stuff look up prestonsturgis.

So there we got all four of your bases covered Seagypsy!
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17059
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 08 Dec 2013, 08:39:27

Lolz Tanada- I hear ya, I really do... 8O

I was harking back to the days of Reverseengineer and Ayoob, among others. I remember fondly the days in 2009 when I had just joined here, the ports stacked full of idle ships, the newposts on po.com adding every few seconds. Looking around the Subic Bay Marina working out which would be the best yacht to steal and pirate back out of the Philippines before the locals realized the cargo cult was over and it's time to slit the white guys throats.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Scrub Puller » Sun 08 Dec 2013, 14:05:08

Yair . . . LMAO . . . and of course I come here for light hearted entertainment!

Cheers.
Scrub Puller
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013, 13:20:59

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Mon 09 Dec 2013, 00:48:38

Tanada wrote:No Zombie Apocalypse? What do you call all those shuffling souls who can only focus on a tiny electronic screen wandering in and out of traffic?

Image
Image
You can still get a dumbphone:
Image
just plug in one of these and you'll feel right at home:
Image
"Reduces up to 96% phone radiation"
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby joewp » Mon 09 Dec 2013, 02:30:25

Keith_McClary wrote:
Tanada wrote:No Zombie Apocalypse? What do you call all those shuffling souls who can only focus on a tiny electronic screen wandering in and out of traffic?

Image


LMAO. It's scarier when they do that driving, though!
Image
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida

Re: Metals in your smartphone have no substitutes

Unread postby Subjectivist » Sat 25 Oct 2014, 14:28:29

Rare Earths crisis is abating. More at the link as well as some nifty graphs.

Everyone can stop worrying now. China's grip over the world's supply of rare-earth metals has weakened considerably — and the country can't hold the global economy hostage, as was once widely feared. Or at least so argues a new paper on the topic.

CHINA'S CONTROL OF THE RARE-EARTH MARKET HAS WEAKENED CONSIDERABLY

Back in 2010, China produced 97 percent of the world's rare earth metals, which are used in everything from the magnets in our headphones and wind turbines to the catalysts in our gasoline refineries. That same year, China began restricting exports as part of a political dispute with Japan. The global price for rare earths skyrocketed, and there was a fair bit of alarm in the US about how China's chokehold on rare earths threatened the economy and even national security.

But the panic turned out to be overblown. In a new working paper from the Council on Foreign Relations, former Pentagon advisor Eugene Gholz explains that the much-feared crisis never actually came to pass. Not long after China restricted exports, other countries quickly began producing their own rare earths — or finding ways to reduce their reliance on the metals. As a result, China's control of the market is much diminished today.

The rise and fall of the rare earth crisis

The chart below, from Reuters' Scott Barber, tells the story. It tracks the price of three key rare earth metals — neodymium, dysprosium, and cerium — over time. (Gold and silver are there for comparison, to show these aren't just general commodity swings.)

When China began restricting exports in 2010, rare earth prices soared. But just two years later, prices were falling back down again. Doom had subsided.
http://www.vox.com/2014/10/22/7031243/china-grip-rare-earth-metals-supply-weakening
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4701
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests