Timo wrote:Even in Oz, nothing is too big to fail. Small is beautiful. Even if the grid is used as an intermitent backup, testify! The BAU folks seem to demand that any discussion of alternatives is an all-or-nothing approach. This is total BS. Make coal the "alternative" energy source! We'll all be better off for it, even if we lose a few of our on-demand electric luxuries.
Good luck convincing people that they will be better off even if they lose those luxuries. The hype surrounding this issue reminds me of the peak oil hype 10 years ago. Every bad thing that happens is blamed on 'peak oil/PV' and touted as proof of an ideology. Though the reality as far as WA is concerned seems to be more about poor management. 40c/kwh is pretty expensive regardless of the price of PV. What was strange to me about the article is the use of a 'panel' as a unit of measure. That is just absurd, an attempt to get the biggest number possible without any scale or relative comparison. Just cheerleading to get the team thinking they are winning. It's pretty common though, generally the standard measure is 'capacity' which is also nonsense because it is not actual power production (usually 20% of capacity).
Meanwhile in the real world, frenzied accumulation continues apace, be it PV panels or TV's. CO2 pollution rates are up every year as near term thinking propels us closer to disaster.
If you want the truth to stand clear before you, never be for or against. The struggle between "for" and "against" is the mind's worst disease. -Sen-ts'an