steam_cannon wrote:As PrestonSturges said "Every cabinet level agency has federal agents with arrest authority" and that means bullets too. Conspiracy theory's are a waste of our time and this sites image. There are plenty of real problems brewing that deserve attention like oil depletion rates.
Remember that phrase: "It's not outlandish to suggest ... "
PrestonSturges wrote:Every cabinet level agency has federal agents with arrest authority. Ever hear of Postal Inspectors? Same thing.
steam_cannon wrote: There are plenty of real problems brewing that deserve attention like oil depletion rates.
basil_hayden wrote: this has already been debunked
mattduke wrote:Who are they planning to shoot?
Plantagenet wrote:Good news. Obama's latest budget request drops his request for SS cuts. The Obama plan to reduce SS COLAs is gone!
Hoooooooo-RAY!
Obama drops his SS cut plan
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
careinke wrote:I just applied for my Social Security. The site was encouraging people to delay collecting, pointing out how much more you could collect by delaying your start, so I ran the numbers.
They estimated my payout at 62 will be $1,600 per month. If I wait until I am 70, the payout would be $2,800 per month ($1,200 per month more).
...
That means I will have to live to 80 years and nine months to break even by waiting. After that, I would lose $1,200 per month compared to taking the age 70 option.
...
So, for me getting my SS back at 62, rather than waiting until 70 seems a no brainer. Besides I have very little confidence the present system will even be around in 2034.
Plantagenet wrote:Do people know about the changes to social security just signed into law by Obama? These laws can reduce SS benefits for couples, widow, and divorced people big time.
In some cases you've got a six month window to file under the old system, assuming you'll reach full retirement age by May 2016 when these benefit cuts go into effect.
social-security-changes-will-hit-couples-divorced-women-hard-2015-11-06
12-secrets-maximizing-social-security-benefits-new-rules
the-state-of-file-and-suspend-where-the-new-social-security-rules-leave-seniors
Obama just cut SS benefits for married couples and others---you can file under the old system up until May 2016.
Outcast_Searcher wrote:
Boo hoo. Whatever we do, let's.....claim this is Obamas' fault ......
Your credibility score on Obama bashing posts just went down in my estimation.
ROCKMAN wrote:Plant - Might have been a great plan many decades ago. But couldn't work now: all the SS monies collected from workers now go directly to recipients today. So there's nothing left over to put into a plan you described. BTW the Rockman gets his first SS check next month. Thank you, suckers! LOL.
I have to agree. Unless you are in excellent health and have a family history averaging longevity past eighty you should get it sooner rather then later. The person that waits until full retirement age has to make it to age 77 to get even and only then is rewarded for waiting.Newfie wrote:Our financial advisor told my Wife to take SS ASAP, before they diminish it.
Sounds like wise advice.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests