Kylon wrote:If I were Saudi Arabia I would focus on nuclear fission technology. It would provide the means to create weapons to protect themselves once they no longer have the protection of the United States (once their oil runs out so does their usefulness).
This might be practical advice for a nation with an educated population in science and technology, but 85% of PhDs in SA are in theology (comparative Wahhabism and such). Importing your nuclear engineers in this neighborhood seems a tad risky.
Analysts generally conclude that Saudi Arabia lacks the natural resources, technological capability, and scientific community necessary to develop an advanced nuclear weapons program.( "Saudi Arabia Country Profile: Nuclear Facilities Profiles," SIPRI, July 2004,
http://www.sipri.org ; Lippman 2008.)
Saudi scientists do not have experience in many integral facets of the nuclear fuel cycle that must be mastered to develop nuclear weapons. For example,
Saudi Arabia does not have uranium deposits on its territory, so it lacks experience in uranium mining. Since the country does not have nuclear power facilities,
its scientists also lack experience in enriching uranium for reactor fuel, nuclear fuel conversion, nuclear fuel fabrication, and operating nuclear reactors.(Yana Feldman, "Country Profile 8: Saudi Arabia," SIPRI, July 2004,
http://www.sipri.org )
Why not use solar energy? It's free, and they have plenty of it. No nasty waste to clean up either.Kylon wrote:The Saudis could also take the nuclear technology were on perfecting it, and use breeder reactors to produce more fuel from things like thorium and U-238. This would give Saudi Arabia a large supply of energy.
This is like suggesting they build a
'fusion' reactor. Several prototype Fast Breeder Reactors have been built, ranging in electrical output from a few light bulbs' equivalent (EBR-I, 1951) to over 1,000 MWe.
As of 2006, the technology is not economically competitive to thermal reactor technology. The SNR-300 fast breeder reactor was finished after 19 years despite cost overruns summing up to a total of 3.6 billion Euros, only to then be abandoned.
link The International Panel on Fissile Materials said
"After six decades and the expenditure of the equivalent of tens of billions of dollars, the promise of breeder reactors remains largely unfulfilled and efforts to commercialize them have been steadily cut back in most countries".
Kylon wrote:It would also create a lot of jobs.
It would produce less than 5,000 permanent jobs in a country of 29,000,000. IMF indicates that the unemployment rate among Saudi nationals is 12%. The youth (30%) and females (35%). Saudi workers represented only 10.9% of the total number of workers in the private sector.
linkKylon wrote:An added bonus is that since that part of the world is Muslim, and allows polygamy, all their brightest engineers, scientist, administrators and all the other people involved in creating this kind of society could have 4 wives with like 10-20 kids a piece. In a few generations they could have an entire sub-population of geniuses, who could then provide the intellectual power to keep the whole society going and growing, whereas in the West the least intelligent breed the most, and the most intelligent breed the least. They could use their religion and polygamy to the advantage of their whole society.
Name 2 countries where the
'best and brightest' have risen to the top? Ever?
How, again, are they going to convince the least educated not to breed when their religion tells them otherwise? People don't stay in power too long on a platform like that. (they usually lose their heads - mobs are funny like that)
Anyway ...
The future will be 'bumpy' regardless ...
Saudi Arabia: Why succession could become a princely tusslehttp://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29792691