Obama to act unilaterally on immigration, irking Republicans
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama will outline a plan on Thursday to relax U.S. immigration policy for as many as 5 million people, bypassing Congress and angering Republicans.
U.S. Representative Paul Ryan, the leading Republican voice on fiscal policy and a potential 2016 presidential candidate, called the plan a "partisan bomb" while a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner branded the president “Emperor Obama” for acting unilaterally.
The White House said Obama will deliver a televised speech at 8 p.m. ET on Thursday (0100 GMT Friday) laying out the plan followed by a trip to Las Vegas on Friday. Nevada is home to the highest proportion of undocumented immigrants.
Frustrated by years of congressional inaction on what most in Washington agree is a broken immigration system, Obama said he is now prepared to use his executive authority.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/obama-act-unilaterally-immigration-irking-republicans-000509564.html
This is a sudden surprising move. I wonder what the real story is.
Did:
a) GOP leaders tell Obama that there won't be an immigration deal
or
b) Did they tell him they really want a deal but the base won't allow it, and secretly they gave him a wink nod to go ahead and do this exec order?
or
c) was this a BOLD political move, pre-empting R's and not even giving them a chance, but just swooshing in with the exec order and claiming victory -- and latino votes, for 2016?
My opinion?
GOP's got no room to complain much, they never sealed that border either -- D's have always wanted latino votes, and R business elite has always wanted the cheap cheap labor, and it's always been that way, and everything else is kabuki theater.
And at the end of the day -- there's like 11 million "illegals" here now. You can't just have a slave class of people with no papers. That can't go on forever. They were allowed in to start with, so I guess that's water under the bridge and something had to be done.
Having said that.. is this exec order excessive.. does it set a bad precedent.. is this the dawn of imperial presidency? Governance by presidential fiat? How is that different from Russia, and other dictatorships?
I'm not a lawyer, but is there any cause the SCOTUS could find to step in on this and stop the executive order?
Just good government theory wise, our system needs a *little* flexibility like this, between the branches. But at some point, executive orders become ridiculous, it's outright legislating from the oval office. But then the courts do that too quite often, legislating from the bench. It's a dance throughout our history, sometimes one branch taking over when another branch just isn't doing its job.
It usually balances out.
You just don't want it going too far though, governance by executive order -- Congress is supposed to be doing that. And they can't just be do-nothings all the time either, because the government has to keep running, things need addressed.
My real opinion: I think the GOP leadership wink nodded on this. Their business base, and their strategic thinkers (need latino votes) have pushed for a deal but the base has pushed so hard against it. I can see Boehner and McConnel saying "look guys, ok you go ahead and do this because we can't get our base to go along, so you do this and we'll yell a bit but it'll be for show."
I just can't see the Obama admin doing such a bold move, unless something else is going on here, behind the scenes.