Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby vox_mundi » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 15:39:22

Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025, Warns Senior Research Scientist at MIT

For over three decades, Stephanie Seneff, PhD, has researched biology and technology, over the years publishing over 170 scholarly peer-reviewed articles [1]. In recent years she has concentrated on the relationship between nutrition and health, tackling such topics as Alzheimer’s, autism, and cardiovascular diseases, as well as the impact of nutritional deficiencies and environmental toxins on human health.

At a conference last Thursday, in a special panel discussion about GMOs, she took the audience by surprise when she declared, “At today’s rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic.” She noted that the side effects of autism closely mimic those of glyphosate toxicity, and presented data showing a remarkably consistent correlation [2] between the use of Roundup on crops (and the creation of Roundup-ready GMO crop seeds) with rising rates of autism. Children with autism have biomarkers indicative of excessive glyphosate, including zinc and iron deficiency, low serum sulfate, seizures, and mitochondrial disorder.

Image

Dr. Seneff noted the ubiquity of glyphosate’s use. Because it is used on corn and soy, all soft drinks and candies sweetened with corn syrup and all chips and cereals that contain soy fillers have small amounts of glyphosate in them, as do our beef and poultry since cattle and chicken are fed GMO corn or soy. Wheat is often sprayed with Roundup just prior to being harvested, which means that all non-organic bread and wheat products would also be sources of glyphosate toxicity. The amount of glyphosate in each product may not be large, but the cumulative effect (especially with as much processed food as Americans eat) could be devastating. A recent study [4] shows that pregnant women living near farms where pesticides are applied have a 60% increased risk of children having an autism spectrum disorder.

This month, the USDA released a study [7] finding that although there were detectable levels of pesticide residue in more than half of food tested by the agency, 99% of samples taken were found to be within levels the government deems safe, and 40% were found to have no detectable trace of pesticides at all. The USDA added, however, that due to “cost concerns,” it did not test for residues of glyphosate. Let’s repeat that: ...
... "the (USDA) never tested for the active ingredient in the most widely used herbicide in the world."

“Cost concerns”? How absurd—unless they mean it will cost them too much in terms of the special relationship between the USDA and Monsanto. You may recall the revolving door between Monsanto and the federal government, with agency officials becoming high-paying executives—and vice versa! Money, power, prestige: it’s all there. Monsanto and the USDA love to scratch each others’ backs. Clearly this omission was purposeful.


PPT slides: http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/Indi ... e_new.pptx

Monsanto claims that Roundup is harmless to humans. Bacteria, fungi, algae, parasites, and plants use a seven-step metabolic route known as the shikimate pathway [10] for the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids; glyphosate inhibits this pathway, causing the plant to die, which is why it’s so effective as an herbicide. Monsanto says humans don’t have this shikimate pathway, so it’s perfectly safe.

Dr. Seneff points out, however, that our gut bacteria do have this pathway, and that’s crucial because these bacteria supply our body with crucial amino acids. Roundup thus kills beneficial gut bacteria, allowing pathogens to grow; interferes with the synthesis of amino acids including methionine, which leads to shortages in critical neurotransmitters and folate; chelates (removes) important minerals like iron, cobalt and manganese; and much more.

Even worse, she notes [11], additional chemicals in Roundup are untested because they’re classified as “inert,” yet according to a 2014 study in BioMed Research International, these chemicals are capable of amplifying the toxic effects of Roundup hundreds of times over.

Glyphosate is present in unusually high quantities in the breast milk of American mothers, at anywhere from 760 to 1,600 times the allowable limits in European drinking water. Urine testing shows Americans have ten times the glyphosate accumulation as Europeans.


“We’ve pretty much sacrificed an entire generation of children. The longer we go, the more damage that is going to accumulate.”


The conundrum ... how to feed 7.3 Billion?

Image
Last edited by vox_mundi on Tue 30 Dec 2014, 15:54:47, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
vox_mundi
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed 27 Sep 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby vox_mundi » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 15:52:55

She seems to have better supporting evidence.

Thiomersal was bullshit from the beginning and has been withdrawn by the author. A 2011 journal article described the vaccine-autism connection as "the most damaging medical hoax of the last 100 years"
User avatar
vox_mundi
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed 27 Sep 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby Sixstrings » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 16:13:18

Dr. Seneff noted the ubiquity of glyphosate’s use. Because it is used on corn and soy, all soft drinks and candies sweetened with corn syrup and all chips and cereals that contain soy fillers have small amounts of glyphosate in them, as do our beef and poultry since cattle and chicken are fed GMO corn or soy. Wheat is often sprayed with Roundup just prior to being harvested, which means that all non-organic bread and wheat products would also be sources of glyphosate toxicity. The amount of glyphosate in each product may not be large, but the cumulative effect (especially with as much processed food as Americans eat) could be devastating. A recent study [4] shows that pregnant women living near farms where pesticides are applied have a 60% increased risk of children having an autism spectrum disorder.


Interesting.

Is it really going to get that bad, 50% of kids born autistic spectrum? It's already been in the news for years about the increasing autism rates, it's already alarming, so why doesn't this issue get more attention.

And what is "autistic spectrum," is it everything from disabling autism to aspergers where it's like a nerd Bill Gates? Is aspergers just what used to be a called a "nerd," someone awkward with narrow interests and good at math?

Here's another thing -- how everyone is ADHD these days. That's been going on for a long time now. All the kids being "adhd." So now they are 20 somethings, and it's people in their 30s too.

And another thing I've noticed is it seems like a lot more people say they are OCD now, than what they used to years ago. Is OCD and ADHD autism spectrum?

What are the cause of all these problems? is it the pesticides on the crops, is it our tech-centered instant gratification lives, what?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby ennui2 » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 16:16:11

Sixstrings wrote:What are the cause of all these problems? is it the pesticides on the crops, is it our tech-centered instant gratification lives, what?


Probably both. I also don't expect any of those factors to change, so raising red flags won't accomplish much. So get ready for a future of Sheldons from The Big Bang theory.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby dorlomin » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 16:17:01

Smells like woo to me.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby Tanada » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 16:30:48

The biggest problem is the powdered baby formula pushed by WIC and other government agencies. It both lacks the essential fatty acids infant brains need to develop properly and is full of pesticide residues from the processed starches used to make it from corn and soybeans.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17059
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby vox_mundi » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 16:43:59

ennui2 wrote:
Sixstrings wrote:What are the cause of all these problems? is it the pesticides on the crops, is it our tech-centered instant gratification lives, what?


Probably both. I also don't expect any of those factors to change, so raising red flags won't accomplish much. So get ready for a future of Sheldons from The Big Bang theory.


Combine Adult Autism Symptoms with a Trigger-Finger Cop (... on the other hand, there will be a 50/50 chance that the cop that's hassling you has Autism)

People with a diagnosis in the autism spectrum have significant problems in both verbal and non-verbal communication and in both sending and understanding messages. This results in behavior that needs to be explained and understood such as:

The individual with ASD may not respond in a typical way to the facial expressions, gestures, tone of voice or physical proximity of others. This may lead officials to interpret the individual as rude, sulky, uncaring, detached, lacking remorse or oppositional.

The individual may interpret what is said in literally, missing information that is inferred or implied. This may cause the individual to seem hostile, oppositional, or intentionally obstructive.

The individual may have problems understanding the passage of time and in being able to distinguish between what is known NOW and what was known at some time in the past. This may cause the individual to appear to have known something in the past that has been learned by the individual more recently.

pg 2: AND JUSTICE FOR ALL: UNLESS YOU HAVE AUTISM


Conventional police interview techniques are not effective for people with autism
... More than 400 UK frontline and investigative police officers holding a variety of ranks provided information for the study. They spoke of the difficulties and challenges they encounter when obtaining written, oral and identification evidence. Officers reported, for example, finding it hard to build rapport with people with autism, which usually plays an important part in interviews. They also described difficulties in arranging a suitable environment for interviews.

"Police stations tend to be noisy with bright or flickering lighting and strange smells. But people with autism are often sensitive to sensory input and as a result they can struggle to maintain concentration in interviews", Dr Maras added.
User avatar
vox_mundi
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed 27 Sep 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby Timo » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 16:58:45

Peak human intelligence?

The Overshoot Predator will all be in our minds!!!!!

AHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Timo
 

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby GHung » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 17:08:36

Image
Blessed are the Meek, for they shall inherit nothing but their Souls. - Anonymous Ghung Person
User avatar
GHung
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3093
Joined: Tue 08 Sep 2009, 16:06:11
Location: Moksha, Nearvana

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby Surf » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 17:10:32

Autism is not only an issue in the US. Itis also an issue world wide including Europe where most countries don't allow GMO crops. Roundup cannot be used on non GMO crops. Given this I highly doubt that Roudup and GMO gropsare a cause.

There is growing evidence that vitamin D deficiency is a strong contributing factor for Autism. When skin is exposed to UV vitamin D is created. However most people today work inside and as a result don't get enough sun exposure.

http://www.lef.org/Magazine/2014/1/Autism-and-Vitamin-D/Page-01

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_autism
Surf
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat 13 Jul 2013, 14:13:49

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby vox_mundi » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 19:13:12

pstarr wrote:How about a little science: ...

The half-life of glyphosate in soil ...

and
Glyphosate does not bioaccumulate in mammals; it is excreted in urine and feces.[20]

and
The EPA considers glyphosate to be noncarcinogenic and relatively low in dermal and oral acute toxicity.[20] The EPA considered a "worst case" dietary risk model of an individual eating a lifetime of food derived entirely from glyphosate-sprayed fields with residues at their maximum levels. This model indicated that no adverse health effects would be expected under such conditions.[20]


I know. I know. EPA is owned and operated by the oil companies. :-x Wait. Wait. That's another conspiracy. The EPA IS own and operated by Monsanto. :-x


How about a little science? Agreed. Let's start with a link? I'm guessing wiki. :)

The facts about Half-Life in soil and water are useful if we were made of clay and had a body temperature between 8-25 degrees Celsius. (Golem?) But that isn't the question she posited. Nor did she imply that glyphosate bio-accumulates in mammals or that it caused cancer.

Her hypothesis states that residual glyphosate interferes with an essential chemical cycle in beneficial gut bacteria that provide the host with a number of essential ligands, nutrients and hormones, absence of which, may cause a disease state. (The fact that it can be measured in feces means it exists unchanged in the gut.)

This is the question that neither EPA nor Monsanto asked or looked into (at least in open-source references).

I've worked for the EPA and curiosity is not one of their strong suits. Regulatory capture by Monsanto occurred years ago, which means that EPA can regulate what the law says and Monsanto wrote the law. Also, Monsanto is not above burying adverse results. It worked so well for the Tobacco industry.

Some of the loopholes you can drive a truck through involves metabolic byproducts and synergistic effects of chemicals in the environment. As a toxicologist, I could see buildup of byproducts in the lab results, but the EPA could not LEGALLY regulate them. :cry:

Personally, I think she may be on to something, but it may be more of multi-faceted cause rather than simply a one component problem.
User avatar
vox_mundi
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed 27 Sep 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby vox_mundi » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 21:14:20

As does all science.
User avatar
vox_mundi
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed 27 Sep 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby Ibon » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 21:24:18

pstarr wrote:So it's a hypothesis? Needs to be tested.


One way would be to check the rise of autism in Argentina in the farming communities growing GMO Soy

http://overgrowthesystem.com/argentina- ... oto-essay/
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9568
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby Newfie » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 21:34:25

I suspect that there are other effects that make this seem bigger than it is. We now have words and categories to define behaviors that were, in old times, just regarded as weird. We didn't have all the psychologists and social workers doing studies at the rate we do now.

That makes it hard to have a good historical baseline for comparison.

Not saying nothing is going wrong, just that it is likely hard to quantify the change.

I would also note that given the adversarialy attitudes expressed here lately it seems likely that many of us have supped on one or more ladle full from that psychological disorder alphabet soup.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18510
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby Tanada » Tue 30 Dec 2014, 23:31:37

Newfie wrote:I suspect that there are other effects that make this seem bigger than it is. We now have words and categories to define behaviors that were, in old times, just regarded as weird. We didn't have all the psychologists and social workers doing studies at the rate we do now.

That makes it hard to have a good historical baseline for comparison.

Not saying nothing is going wrong, just that it is likely hard to quantify the change.

I would also note that given the adversarialy attitudes expressed here lately it seems likely that many of us have supped on one or more ladle full from that psychological disorder alphabet soup.


You make an excellent point, my favorite example is the medical specializations like Cardiology. Up until the 1920's it never occurred to medical doctors to focus on a single internal organ because you had a hard time knowing what went wrong until you did exploratory surgery or an autopsy. Then a genius figured out how to build the first Electrocardiogram machine and Viole' a new specialty was born. Before the 1920's very few deaths were recorded as Myocardial Infarction (heart attack), unless you died in front of a doctor you had to do an autopsy to know for certain and most people had neither the desire nor funds to pay for one. After the Electrocardiogram was invented patients who had been tested were studied intensively and as that was done the patterns showing heart problems were figured out. Suddenly death from heart failure became a much more frequent statement on death certificates. Did we really have a massive increase in the number of deaths from heart disease, or did we just figure out the symptoms detectable by our new machines?

Autism, Obesity, Type II Diabetes...they have all been redefined in the last few decades so naturally with the new definitions many more people are classified as being afflicted. Add in much easier access to modern medicine in First and Second world countries with excellent record keeping and it becomes a statistical game. It used to be if you had Type II Diabetes you were diagnosed when your beta cells burned out and you had to start taking insulin shots. Now they do routine blood tests and if your glucose levels are persistently high they classify you as Type II Diabetic and start throwing prescription drugs at you to keep you healthy(ish)
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17059
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Unread postby dissident » Wed 31 Dec 2014, 00:15:32

It is almost an obsession in science and medicine to look for silver bullet explanations. Complex multivariate processes are too much for the human brain to digest and are difficult to identify and communicate in the science literature. There is basically a type of selection bias in research that biases work and publications to simplistic interpretations.

This Monsanto chemical soup appears to a case where the research system chokes. The correlation plot presented above is not automatically a causation plot. It could very well be a whole slew of other chemical species and their interaction that is involved and the one species is like a label for the whole soup. You could choose other chemicals in the soup and produce similar correlation plots.

A specific example of what I am talking about can be seen in fruits. They have formaldehyde that forms toxic formic acid when consumed. Would anyone seriously believe that fruits are toxic? Obviously not. The key is that formaldehyde is part of a whole slew of chemical species that have to be analyzed as a system and not individually. The wikipedia page on aspartame turns this argument upside down and invokes the fact that fruit have formaldehyde as proof that aspartame is safe. This is patent BS. The authors of that wikipedia "woo" should live their advice and consume some formaldehyde. Aspartame is toxic because it releases formic acid in the blood stream. It does not have the spectrum of chemical species you find in fruit that would counteract the toxic effects.

In the case of the Monsanto product the combined effect of their concoction is basically guaranteed to be damaging to health. This product was never designed to be safe. Their excuse that humans lack some particular chemical pathway is ludicrous. Chemicals do not have effects limited to specific chemical reaction chains and the Monsanto product is obviously not composed of chemically inert compounds.

A previous post appealed to the chemical lifetime of a few weeks. That is rather irrelevant if people eat bread every day and not once every six months. The chemical lifetime in soil is also not relevant to the chemical lifetime in food products such as bread. There are vastly more chemical and biochemical (bacterial) processes in the soil that can break down hydrocarbon compounds.
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Next

Return to Environment, Weather & Climate

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests